User talk:Ardyjofry

September 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Battle off Mukah, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 05:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle off Mukah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FifthFive (talk) 06:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle off Mukah, you may be blocked from editing. Squeakachu (talk) 16:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle off Mukah. Squeakachu (talk) 05:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Battle off Mukah, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NotAGenious (talk) 05:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week because of your persistent unconstructive editing, at least some of which is vandalism, as for example your latest edit in the article Battle off Mukah. Also. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you decide to return to editing when the block is over, please don't post text in which every word begins with a capital letter. JBW (talk) 15:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Battle off Mukah—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:27, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Siamese Invasion of Malacca

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Siamese Invasion of Malacca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm CycloneYoris. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Ardyjofry that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:CoconutOctopus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 09:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. CoconutOctopus talk 20:00, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of First war expedition to Sadok hill

Hello, Ardyjofry,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Grahaml35, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, First war expedition to Sadok hill, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Grahaml35}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Grahaml35 (talk) 17:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First war expedition to Sadok hill moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to First war expedition to Sadok hill. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it is purely an infobox. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CoconutOctopus talk 18:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: First war expedition to Sadok hill (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Grahaml35 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article is blank other than infobox.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:First war expedition to Sadok hill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Grahaml35 (talk) 18:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ardyjofry! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Grahaml35 (talk) 18:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of First war expedition to Sadok hill

Hello Ardyjofry,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username CoconutOctopus, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, First war expedition to Sadok hill, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Rentap#First war expedition to Sadok Hill. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CoconutOctopus}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 20:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jofry - Baseddruzi war moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jofry - Baseddruzi war. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and No content, and a search online shows no evidence this war exists.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CoconutOctopus talk 19:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ardyjofry, please don't just move this article back to mainspace or I'll unfortunately have to nominate it for deletion. Please stop posting empty and nearly empty articles in mainspace or you may be blocked from editing. CoconutOctopus talk 19:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jofry - Baseddruzi war

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Jofry - Baseddruzi war, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CoconutOctopus talk 19:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jofry - Baseddruzi war (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No actual article content and no sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jofry - Baseddruzi war and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 20:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you decided to inappropriately use your talk page while blocked, I have revoked your talk page access. Goodbye. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.