User talk:Archmedhis

Welcome!

Hello, Archmedhis, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Politics Nigeria, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 2Joules (talk) 11:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Politics Nigeria

The article Politics Nigeria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There should be WP:RS that mention this online newspaper, but I cannot find any in depth coverage. Maybe the creator or an expert in Nigerian media organizations can remedy the lack of RS, otherwise it should be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2Joules (talk) 11:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zohar Pinhasi

Hello Archmedhis,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Zohar Pinhasi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Your addition to Chinko Ekun has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 11:42, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Precious Okoye for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Precious Okoye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precious Okoye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wealthypersons.com as a source

Hi Archmedhis. I noticed that you used wealthypersons.com as a source for biographical information in Andrew Tate. I am unable to find any evidence or discussion indicating that it meets reliable sourcing criteria for such information. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 21:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chidinma ojukwu

The article Chidinma ojukwu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Person has not been convicted of anything: see WP:BLPCRIME.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 16:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

discospinster I understand that WP:BLPCRIME says an accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law, but I feel this case is different as the Alleged suspect confessed and admitted to the murder on National Television and to National Newspaper [1], [2] Archmedhis (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even if she supposedly confessed, she has not been convicted, so the policy still applies. ... discospinster _talk 17:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen Gloria Pérez moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carmen Gloria Pérez, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carmen Gloria Pérez (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are either brief mentions, or interviews which are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability. Also does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR (not part of the main cast).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carmen Gloria Pérez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:30, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Archmedhis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:30, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Carmen Gloria Pérez

Hello, Archmedhis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carmen Gloria Pérez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Carmen Gloria Pérez

Hello, Archmedhis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carmen Gloria Pérez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]