User talk:Archery minded

February 2024

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Eagle (2024 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 05:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rs 6 crore From this https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment-news/box-office/telugu/eagle-box-office-collection-day-1-ravi-teja-film-pockets-rs-6-crore-on-opening-day-article-107566574 Archery minded (talk) 06:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Aintabli. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Aintabli (talk) 05:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Amaran (upcoming film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User_talk:Aintabli#Amaran_(upcoming_film). I'm clean-uping the article which is not in correct format with unreliable sources and extra sources. Archery minded (talk) 05:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amaran

The refs are very badly formatted. Can you please help fixing them while avoiding edit conflicts? Kailash29792 (talk) 04:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now correcting the errors. After my edits you please do. So we can avoid edit conflicts. Thanks. Archery minded (talk) 04:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Cricket Butterfly per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cricket Butterfly. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]