User talk:ArchPG

Welcome!

Hello, ARCH.architecture, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for New exit for the Uffizi Gallery. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cnilep (talk) 04:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Flores & Prats

Thanks for creating Flores & Prats.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Overall the article looks good, but there are some phrases which should be made a bit more neutral, such as the introduction to the Awards section

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cristiano Toraldo di Francia (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cristiano Toraldo di Francia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cristiano Toraldo di Francia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ARCH.architecture! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia cannot reference itself

Despite repeated reverts you continue to use Wikipedia as a source in your citations, please note Wikipedia cannot reference itself. Theroadislong (talk) 16:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:05, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, you've been here a while, and this should have been pointed out before: you can't have that name. Changing it shouldn't be too hard, though, if you follow the process outlined above. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 17:06, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ArchPG (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I am an architect, author of some books on contemporary architecture. This is why my name is ARCH.architecture. If preferable, I have no problem changing my username. Would archPG be more appropriate, PG being my initials?

Accept reason:

accept renamed..-- Deep fried okra 20:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

at the bottom of your talk page.

globally renamed ARCH.architecture to ArchPG

globally renamed ARCH.architecture to ArchPG. Sorry for the inconvenience. Welcome back.-- Deep fried okra 20:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cristiano Toraldo di Francia concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cristiano Toraldo di Francia, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cristiano Toraldo di Francia

Hello, ArchPG. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cristiano Toraldo di Francia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]