User talk:Apandeyhp89

Welcome!

Hi Apandeyhp89! I noticed your contributions to Spiti and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Icabobin (talk) 15:30, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lobzang Chhodon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only mentioned by name in the first source, which is an autobiography. Searching online returned only the social media profiles of unrelated individuals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:54, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

She is an important figure, but what you say is true too; not much else has yet been published on her. Maybe then, it's only right, if this article gets deleted. When more turns up on this in the future, an article on this person can be put up again. Apandeyhp89 (talk) 20:38, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Apandeyhp89,

Should more sources turn up in the future and you are still editing Wikipedia, you can ask for this article to be restored at WP:REFUND. I don't recommend doing so until there is more citations and references that you've located or it will probably just be tagged for an AFD discussion. If it is deleted at AFD, it will be much harder to restore so I'd wait until more supporting literature is found. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:56, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your work on northern Himachal Pradesh! Feel free to join Wikipedia:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge and put up any articles you do! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Apandeyhp89 (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for J. P. S. Uberoi

On 10 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article J. P. S. Uberoi, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 00:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, Stephen! Apandeyhp89 (talk) 13:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former Indian royals in Pakistani Army has been nominated for splitting

Category:Former Indian royals in Pakistani Army has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 11:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian royals in Indian Army has been nominated for splitting

Category:Indian royals in Indian Army has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 11:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian royals in British Indian Army has been nominated for splitting

Category:Indian royals in British Indian Army has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 11:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category contents for listification

Hi! Following Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 30#Category:Indian royals in British Indian Army, I am copying the contents of the three nominated categories to your talk page for listification when you have a minute.

From Category:Indian royals in British Indian Army:

From Category:Indian royals in Indian Army:

And from Category:Former Indian royals in Pakistani Army:

Best, House Blaster (talk · he/they) 20:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Houseblaster, thanks for posting these entries here. I have created a list page titled "South Asian royals in modern South Asian armies" to accommodate the people listed in these categories. The page is currently awaiting review. Best wishes, Apandeyhp89. Apandeyhp89 (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Feel free to gut the quick lists I made Draft:List of former Indian royalty in the Pakistani Army,

Draft:List of Indian royalty in the Indian Army, and Draft:List_of_Indian_royalty_in_the_British_Indian_Army Mason (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Asian royals in modern South Asian armies moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to South Asian royals in modern South Asian armies. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 21:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st-century Indian female writers

A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century Indian female writers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, yes, please go ahead with the deletion. Before creating this category, I did not know that a similar one already existed, by the name '21st-century Indian women writers'. Therefore, this new category I created becomes redundant. Thank you. Apandeyhp89 (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]