User talk:Aoclery

Tony, is that you? This is Andries. Welcome!

Hello, Aoclery, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Please do not write nonsense in Wikipedia, e.g. in cognitive dissonance. Andries

Yes it is me...How are you. Cognitive Dissonance is an accepted psychological term by Festinger. I have coined the Carnalitas to cover a specific section of it with regard to eastern philosophies and meat eating ahimsa. As this is specific to eastern and not western I needed to coin a phrase cognitive dissonance carnalitas--Aoclery 20:34, 29 November 2005 (UTC).........Tony.

Original research

Original research is not allowed on wikipedia. Therfore, respectfully, moves are afoot to delete your article Cognitive dissonance carnalitis. Also, please do not add references to your own web sites to Wikipedia, unless these are high-quality recognised authorities on the matters in hand. --File Éireann 22:23, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Apology

I'm very sorry. I did not read your notes properly. I did not realise you were a professor. I'm sure we will all benefit from your work in the weeks and months to come. One of my jobs on wikipedia is to edit out stuff that shouldn't be there - that was clearly not the case here. Apologies once more. If I can ever make it up to you on Wikipedia, or if you need any help editing this encyclopaedia, let me know--File Éireann 21:24, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Please read the guidelines carefully

Tony can you please read the guidelines of Wikipedia carefully, before editing and especially before starting a new article? Many of your latest edits break the guidelines and your articles will deleted and your edits reverted. You may even get blocked by admins Andries 21:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Any specific suggestion for me to look at? Also Brendan thought I was a professor when I actually quoted a Advaitin 'Don' V K Krishnamurthy recommending my commentaries on Thomas from an Advaitic point of view..However it seems my work is original therefore not acceptable. The Gospel translations are not original but my commentaries are, it seems that is not acceptable?--Aoclery 23:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)Tony

Alas, unfortunately, Wikipedia, does not allow commentaries, this being an encyclopaedia. Factual information only and not personal scholarly opinion is allowed. Your additions are highly interesting but many are likely to be deleted in the coming weeks.--File Éireann 18:58, 14 December 2005 (UTC) Yes I'm getting the message, hahah.......I understand now. I should have looked at the rules rather than existing articles. When all else fails read the instructions! I see how they sneak in their interpretations though..........--Aoclery 22:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC)Tony.

Louth village

Louth, County Louth would be an excellent subject for a wikipedia article. Go right ahead and develop the article.--File Éireann 00:14, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

I have moved the material from Louth, County Louth to County Louthas your additions appear to relate to the county. Of course, you can edit the original page if you would like to provide information on the village.--File Éireann 18:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Actually my mother and sister and family live in Co Louth....Tony O'Clery.

ajativada

Thank you for the alert regarding ajativada. I re-wrote the article into a form that should withstand the vote for deletion process. — goethean ॐ 21:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Got itWikipedia isn't a magazine....--Aoclery 00:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Tony. Editing; I am now editing the page, hopefully within the guidlines..--Aoclery 16:46, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Tony.

idea

Hi Tony. Why don't you write an article on Sri Swami Atmananda? I will work with you to make sure that the text is formatted and sourced correctly so that the article will not be deleted. — goethean ॐ 17:30, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Alert

Somebody has turned your article MANDUKYA UPANISHAD into a link to the pre-existing articleMandukya Upanishad. I recommend you retrieve the text of your article using the history section of MANDUKA UPSHANID and edit it into the other article.--File Éireann 22:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Gospel reverts

Not sure why you wanted to put back the external link on Vedanta article. This person under IP 24.207.41.230 and 24.207.41.101 had been adding the link to multiple articles with no relavance but self promotion. Please check the talk page of the user for more info. - Ganeshk 05:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Actually it is about building bridges and education......Tony--Aoclery 21:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Sathya Sai Baba, is not consistent with our policy on attribution and verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. KZ^{Talk• Contribs} 09:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

You area adding the same unsourced content to other pages. Please see WP:ATT for more information. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

A serious message - PLEASE READ

---

You are continually adding defamatory content to the Sathya Sai Baba article and other related articles from the Category:Sathya Sai Baba. Your edits are a violation of both the Arbitration Committe rulings about the Sathya Sai Baba article. You add unsourced, controversial, defamatory information. You also keep POV pushing and editwarring. If you continue doing it then it will most likely result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kkrystian (talk • contribs) 17:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC).

AS A FORMER OFFICIAL OF THE SAI ORGANISATION, I AM MY OWN SOURCE PARTICULARLY AS I INVENTED THE IDEA OF SAYING THE MOLESTATIONS WERE RAISING KUNDALINI, WHICH WAS A LIE I PROPAGATED TO PROTECT SAI BABA AT THE TIME. WHICH I SINCERELY REGRET.TONY O'CLERY.

You are not allowed to do it. We have no evidence that you really are who you say you are so you may be lying. PLEASE STOP INSERTING THiS DEFAMATORY TEXT. Krystian 09:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

You know damn well who Tony O'Clery is--myself. I am admitting that it was I who made up the kundalini excuse for sai baba's behaviour along with other officials...It is my confession and a true source.

Last warning

Continuously adding material to articles that are not based on published reliable sources, is disruptive and can result in your editing privileges being temporarily withdrawn. This is your last warning. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for vandalism of Wikipedia

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 15:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT THIS ENCYCLOPEDIA CAN PUBLISH ANY AMOUNT OF LIES ABOUT SAI BABA PROPAGATED BY DELUDED DEVOTEES OR FELLOW MEMBERS OF THE GAY-PEDOPHILE-GROUPIE CLUBS. YET WHEN I ACTUALLY ADMIT AND CONFESS THAT I WAS THE ONE WHO INVENTED THE KUNDALINI EXCUSE FOR SAI BABA'S MOLESTATIONS,WHEN I WAS AN OFFICIAL, I GET A TEMPORARY BLOCK ORGANISED BY SOME KHRYSTIAN A SAI DEVOTEE AND A FELLOW SYMPATHISER JOSSI. NO WONDER WIKIPEDIA IS FALLING INTO DISREPUTE AND IRRELEVANCY.

I became a member of the now defunct yahoo group Sai Unity just after Tony left it and from what I read there, I think there is good reason to believe Tony in this matter. Nevertheless, I admit that Tony's contributions (which are not vandalism) are not in accordance with Wikipedia contents policies i.e. that his additions were not published in a reliable sources. Andries 21:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Serves you right that you're blocked. You're trying to spread your (very bad quality) anti-Sai propaganda on Wikipedia and You will fail. You will not manage to deceive anybody. Krystian 16:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Blocking me is like Canute blocking the waves, there are many others to help and I will be back. Truth will out in the end, even in face of the gay-pedophile-groupies, and their pro sai propaganda...Tony. Before the psychotics and pedophile groupies start screaming, let me just say this. It is quite possible that others had made up the kundalini excuse for sai baba's behaviour before I did. However as far as I know I was the first to popularise it on the internet. It wasn't a lie as such but a lame excuse from a devotee at the time.'The Findings' written by David Bailey were also put on the net in a large magazine by my efforts, so releasing the wall of truth on to the deception of sathaya sai baba. I have edited ParaAdvaita into the description of Ajativada on that named page........Tony.

February 2013

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I am referring to this and this. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 17:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

I AM NOT ATTACKING THE 'EDITOR' PER SE BUT HIS ACTIONS............WHICH ARE MOSTLY SELF INDULGENT.............AND EGO MOTIVATED. He deleted a reference i had put in to help people understand my article and the philosophy in it...namely sanksrit words and phrases..I wish people would give up thinking they understand every entry ......i will undo of course.

There was a discussion regarding Sanksrit words and phrases here. Carlossuarez46‎ is just trying to implement the consensus. If you think this category should not be removed give your reasons on their talk page. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 17:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

CONSENSUS WITH PEOPLE WHO DO NOT GRASP THE SITUATION IS IRRELEVANT.

DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME 'EDITING' MY WIKIPAGE AS YOU OBVIOUSLY DO NOT READ IT THROUGH OR UNDERSTAND OR FULLY GRASP THE CONCEPT ONLY 1 IN 10,MILLION DO...TONY O'CLERY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aoclery (talk • contribs) 20:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Ajativada is not advaita as it is above advaita para advaita.....

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Ajativada. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Ajativada. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ajativada, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Joshua Jonathan with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vacation9 17:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Tony O'Clery 20 hours ago I see my wikipage on ajativada was edited read attacked by an intellectual feckwit who obviously couldn't grasp the essence of the meaning...joshual johnson a twit...Probably a friend of one of the intellectual twits i deleted.....hahahahah I recleaned it anyway and will continue..... Like · · Share Pamela Carr likes this.

Tony O'Clery Too many nondual neo advaitins cannot get out of their own minds as that is the source of all their pride and ego. 20 hours ago · Like · 1

Tony O'Clery Some like john lekay who have a non dual website have pics with the book 'I am that' but obviously do not grasp it and just cherry pick 20 hours ago · Like

Tony O'Clery that is not his name but he knows who he is and his friends that were on here 19 hours ago · Like

Tony O'Clery they added in all kinds of advaita and neo advaita pages...never happened in several years so i was obvious who did it----the losers. 18 hours ago · Like

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Ajativada. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ajativada, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing.

Hi Tony. Let's repeat again: Wikipedia does not acknowledge "ownership" of articles. And information should be properly sourced. Removing {{source?}}-tags is not exactly the same as provoding sources. I'll undo your edits again; if you revert again, I'll report you to ANI. Greetings, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:13, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

How can anyone edit something they do not grasp or understand and mistake it for something else......................Tony...

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

Please do not add your comments on the User page of another editor. They belong on the talk page. Lova Falk talk 20:09, 14 February 2013 (UTC) "I am trying to tell you ---Give up all this trash, whatever you are studying in the name of religion , in the name of spirituality. Understand only one thing -That godly principle is there..that 'I amness', or consciousness-that is godliest of principles. It is there as long as the vital breath or life force is there."

Nisargadatta .Maharaj. "Be still, and know that 'I am', (is) God" (Psalm 46:10), Before Abraham was 'I Am'-----Jesus..............

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Lova Falk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please use the talk page for your comments. Lova Falk talk 20:12, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. So what you are telling them that you cannot grasp the meaning of ajativad and john le kay put you up to harrassing me wiht edits on the page................Tony

I have exposed you on facbook and will also spread it more on the web...

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I have imposed a block following the AN/I report mentioned above. I will happily lift the block (and/or be happy for another admin to lift the block) as soon as you can reassure us that you won't personally attack other editors or describe pages here on WP as your own as you have done recently. Please reassure us you will edit more collegially and the block will be lifted. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 21:52, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Just a rant that includes some personal attacks in it, let's not bother reading it. By the way, Tony, if you continue, your talkpage access will be revoked
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
KIM DENT BROWN OR MINION...JOSHUA JONATHAN EDITED MY PAGE OVER 24 TIMES ABOUT IN 24 HOURS AS HE WAS PUT UP TO IT BY JOHN LE KAY AND ANOTHER GUY HOVILA WHO I BLOCKED ON MY FACEBOOK.SO HE HARRASSED ME BY 'EDITING' AND IT WAS OBVIOUS HE COULD NOT GRASP THE CONCEPT OF AJATIVADA AS A FULL BUCKET CANNOT UNDERSTAND A FULL BATH....SO YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT AD HOMINEN ATTACKS MY ATTACK IS NOT SO BUT A DEFENCE.............I DON'T CARE ANYWAY TOO MANY FUCKWITS EDITING .TONY AS I SAID I HAVE EXPOSED IT ON MY FB AND WEBPAGES ADN NOW WILL INCLUDE YOU AS YOU ARE A BAD JUDGE.

If you would like to appeal this block, please follow the instructions inside the template above. But do please read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 22:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

THIS IS JUST PREJUDICE ON BEHALF OF KIK BALLOCKS-BROWN AND HIS ISLAMIC MATE JOSHUA TO PREVENT THE REAL TRUTH OF AJATIVAD BEING PRESENTED AND THE SPURIOUS CLAIM OF THE BUDDHIST RELIGIOUS IDIOTS BEING PRESENTED....I COULD PRESENT EVIDENCE FROM THE UPANISHADS ADN THE RIG VEDA THAT AJATIVADA IS AND ANCIENT VEDANTIC UNDERSTANDING GOING BACK THOUSANDS OF YEARS...THIS IS WHY WIKI PEDIA IS NOT RECOGNISED DUE TO FAVOURTISM AND IGNORANCE OF KIM BALLOCKS-BROWN ETC

Thanks Tony, you make a convincing case in favour of the indefinite block. Talk page access revoked. You can appeal your block here. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 19:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC)