User talk:Antonyrao

Any issues on my submissions always available on Talk page

Speedy deletion nomination of StuMagz India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on StuMagz India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:51, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Antonyrao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please my dear contributors reconsider my request unblock so that will contribute to community in a betterway

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Antonyrao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My dear administrators and community members. Yes, I have committed and vandalized serious policy of Wikipedia. I had used multiple accounts too. I Accept my mistakes. I regret for the same and apologies for the ignorance.

Here to make clear i have committed the socket puppeteer. I have used the accounts Vijayabhaskar02, Antonyrao, Rakeshroshan1992. As my client has given amount for article contribution i have committed these mistakes with Conflict of Interest. For the purpose of money making i made serious mistake and fake contributions to the community which is unacceptable. Though please give me a second chance to prove myself under your guidance. Monitor me keenly. In Future I sincerely contribute with the great hope and common sense to the community with valid citations and references.

I sincerely request you to unblock my IP Address and unblock my accounts. so that i will be using only one account i.e Vijayabhaskar02 or upon your suggestion you can decide to which account i need to use for community contributions. Also i need your mentor-ship to contribution to the community in a better-way. Antonyrao (talk) 19:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You must request unblock from your original account. If that account does not have talk page access, you will need to make your appeal using WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.