User talk:Antonios aigyptos

Please leave any comments for me on this talk page. Use the small '+' link near the 'Edit this Page' tab at the top of the page to create a new section on this page for your comment. -Antonios aigyptos 09:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Thanks for your feedback. I see that you are interested in Eastern Orthodoxy. If you wonder what you could do to improve the coverage of this subject, please take a note that Saint Chariton, Saint Hermolaus, Saint Florus and Lauros do not have articles in this project. St. Paraskebas have two - Paraskevi and Petca Parasceva (see Agia Paraskevi (disambiguation)), which is kind of confusing. There is no article about St. Theodore the Stratilate, but we have Theodore of Amasea. In short, Orthodox saints seriously need sorting out. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 10:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the pointer towards articles that need some work. These sound interesting. I'll have a look and make a start soon. —Antonios Aigyptos^talk 13:47, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've consolidated the existing text from the two articles on St Petka into a single article at Paraskevi, and turned the duplicate article into a redirect to this page. This takes care of the duplication issue, but I see that the Agia Paraskevi (disambiguation) still lists there as being two articles. Any way to get rid of this? —Antonios Aigyptos^talk 14:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you figured it out yourself. Thanks for your helpful edits. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 12:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trisagion

My apologies. It was completely inadvertent. TCC (talk) (contribs) 21:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the Trisagion page! Majoreditor 02:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Raphael of Brooklyn

Hey can I get a clarification on if this image is OK to use from Orthodoxwiki. LoveMonkey 02:59, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Thoughts on the John Chrysostom Article?

Hi, Antonios. I was wondering if you could look at the John Chrysostom and make or suggest improvements.  Thanks. Majoreditor 02:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article for deletion

Hey help me with this article deletion please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Historical_persecution_by_atheism#.5B.5BHistorical_persecution_by_atheism.5D.5D I would like to word it right but can not because there is no way to not be offensive I can't think of how. LoveMonkey 06:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible renaming of Wikipedia:WikiProject Saints

It has been suggested that the above named project be renamed Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian saints. Please express your opinion on this proposed renaming, and the accompanying re-definition of the scope of the project, here. John Carter 16:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episcopal Vicariate

Dear Antonios Aegyptos,

I have removed your recent text which I am afraid is nothing more than polemic. The basic point is that the MP has now accepted +Basil's current status, however reluctantly, and it is of no help to continue to trawl over what you claim is "illegality" but which is reality was a successful appeal to Constantinople under the Canons of the Church.

Yours,

Atrebatus —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.145.241.7 (talk) 04:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hello Atrebatus. I'm afraid your removal of that text and replacement with your short summary is not appropriate to Wikipedia's approach to accuracy. I've restored the text, and explained the reasons in the Talk Page for that article. Please do see those notes and feel free to comment if you wish. —Antonios Aigyptos^talk 13:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Dear Antonios Aegyptos,

You say, in your now reinstated contribution :-

"In the days following 27 March, the Vicariate ran a notice on its website[16] claiming that in Moscow's release of Bishop Basil from its jurisdiction, it 'recognised the validity of the Vicariate', a claim that had no foundation in the decision of the Patriarchate or the comments of Metropolitan Kyrill, neither of which mentioned the Vicariate. This reporting was seen by some as a deliberate attempt to reframe the decision's criticism of Bishop Basil's illegal move in terms positive to the Vicariate. The notice was later removed from the Vicariate's website, though not in a regular manner: it remains absent from the site's archive of 'events, documents, press releases etc since April 2006'[17], in which it does not appear, despite having been posted on the news index for much of April 2007".

As a close observer of the exarchate-uk site, I can tell you the only items the site ran were (1) a verbatim report of the Minutes of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church dated 27 March 2007, and (2) a verbatim report of a press conference by Metropolitan Kyrill of Smolensk published by Blagovest-info on 29 March.

I think you do need to produce specific evidence if you consider that I have overlooked something.

You might also be interested to know that the new Sourozh Diocesan website [1] has removed all the links to the earlier decisions of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church concerning Bishop Basil. These documents are still available, but only on specific application to the webmaster.

Regards

Atrebatus

Dear Atrebatus, thanks for these comments. The comment on exarchate-uk.org was witnessed by at least four people whom I've spoken to, as well as me personally. I'll get a cached version of the page for reference. It was definitely there, with those words in commentary; and has very conspicuously been removed and not moved to the archives.

Yes, the new Sourozh Diocese site doesn't list all the old materials (Same with the Vicariate, whose old site, dioceseinfo.org, also no longer has its texts online).

—Antonios Aigyptos^talk 20:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Antonios Aegyptus,

I need to say in public that the phrases you allege were included on the exarchate-uk site were simply never there, and therefore they were never deleted. I stand by what I said in my earlier comment to you.

Atrebatus

WikiProject Christianity

Hello Antonios aigyptos!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 16:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Request for consensus for editing Template:Catholicism

You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Catholicism#Edit_request_on_7_December_2012 to edit the list of Doctors of the Church to add John of Avila and Hildegard of Bingen and do this by embedding Template:Churchdoctor. I am messaging you because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 16:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 12:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]