User talk:Antiok 1pie

Archives

August 2022

Hi, I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of The Dawn of Everything several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:The Dawn of Everything, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. You should have begun a discussion on the talk page to gain consensus for the changes, not re-reverted. Schazjmd (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do see that you've engaged in the talk page discussion, which is great; the above is just information to keep in mind the next time that you encounter resistance to your edits on an article. Schazjmd (talk) 14:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning; I made sure not violate WP:3RR. The dispute seems to have been solved in the talk page now. Antiok 1pie (talk) 20:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've been watching the talk page discussion and article edits. It's great to see you all collaborating so well. Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 20:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another copyright violation this time at [[Jared Taylor{{

And it was also lifted out of context. Doug Weller talk 14:43, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't (and won't) revert since I regard my edit simply as interesting trivia, but I honestly don't see how the addition of a 7-word sentence to the article, with 6 of them being the same as in the source, was a copyvio. Antiok 1pie (talk) 20:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AI editing

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Selfstudier (talk) 19:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I'll keep it in mind. Antiok 1pie (talk) 20:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's BS!

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		Thank you for helping to clear the log-jam at Talk:Trail of Tears and your balanced additions to the Trail of Tears article. Good work. GenQuest ^"scribble" 22:14, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate the barnstar. Glad I could help balance the article. Antiok 1pie (talk) 01:53, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton talk page

I just wanted to let you know that (the supposed) historian Porwancher posted a message on Talk:Alexander Hamilton about your additions to the section about Hamilton's relationship with Jews and Judaism. By the way, I trimmed down the entire article, which included your additions a while ago. Wow (talk) 12:56, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me, I had removed the page from my watchlist. Also, your edits are fine, that section seemed too big anyways. Antiok 1pie (talk) 16:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your edit on Eric Foner on the James Madison page were really good. Possibly you can try to come up with better wording for the third and closing paragraph in the "Ratification" section of the James Madison article. If you could improve on the wording there in that section, then you could add your edit there and maybe take away the template tag there. Nice comment on Eric Foner. ErnestKrause (talk) 16:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence James Madison. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Freoh (talk) 16:55, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no canvasing here. It is an edit request. ErnestKrause (talk) 17:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ErnestKrause. I'll try to find some sources and see if I can help. Antiok 1pie (talk) 17:22, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was a really good attempt; User:Dhtwiki is asking that you adjust it a little based on his comments on the Madison Talk page, and I'm supporting you as well to try this and make a new edit in order to remove the section template tag. Nice going so far and Dhtwiki seems to also be supporting. ErnestKrause (talk) 15:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economy of Nazi Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiley. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huey P. Newton

Hi Antiok 1pie, please see primary. Interviews, first hand accounts, etc. are primary sources rather than secondary, even if they are published by an otherwise reliable source so Berkley Revolution is a primary source rather than secondary in this instance. I am not going to revert your change but did want to call attention to the difference between primary vs. secondary. S0091 (talk) 21:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I'm aware that interviews are primary sources, but I was under the impression that the "Berkeley Revolution" source is secondary since it summarizes (and comments on) the primary source, i.e the interview. Antiok 1pie (talk) 21:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see where they commented on the rape or provided any analysis. That paragraph is only regurgitating what she states in regards to the rape as is the The Guardian. On another note, I am note sure the Peoples Temple of the Disciples of Christ section is WP:due so curious about your thoughts but likely better to discuss on the article's talk page. S0091 (talk) 21:30, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I don't think it warrants a section of its own, but at the same time I don't think that there's any other place in the article where the section would fit. Antiok 1pie (talk) 22:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

California Genocide

MAY 2023

Hello Antiok,

I saw that you had taken down an edit by Panchitowoo on May 1st 2023. You mentioned that their addition was "unsourced". The links below that I am about to provide are the articles (sources) that they used to make those edits. Can you please elaborate as to what you were referring to as "unsourced".

Thank you.

Greene, J. A., & Scott, D. D. (2006). Identifying Sand Creek Massacre Site Archaeological Reconnaissance . In Finding sand creek: History, archeology, and the 1864 massacre site. essay, Univ of Oklahoma Pr.

Schneider, Tsim D. “PLACING REFUGE AND THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF INDIGENOUS HINTERLANDS IN COLONIAL CALIFORNIA.” American Antiquity, vol. 80, no. 4, 2015, pp. 695–713. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24712799. Accessed 30 Apr. 2023.

Karp, M. T. (2012). The indian island massacre: Place, labor, and environmental change on california's northwest coast, 1850–1935 (Order No. 1515536). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global: The Humanities and Social Sciences Collection. (1033779926). Retrieved from http://proxy.library.cpp.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/indian-island-massacre-place-labor-environmental/docview/1033779926/se-2 Jumpoutboyz (talk) 17:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russell T. Warne (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This person does not appear to satisfy wp:NPROF. A lot of the sources are just interviews so it is not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Russell T. Warne and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 02:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antiok 1pie! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca ^{talk to me!} 02:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Russell T. Warne

Hello, Antiok 1pie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Russell T. Warne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Russell T. Warne

Hello, Antiok 1pie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Russell T. Warne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]