Jump to content

Talk:Alexander Hamilton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAlexander Hamilton has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 15, 2004Peer reviewReviewed
March 10, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 21, 2015Peer reviewReviewed
March 2, 2015Good article nomineeListed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 11, 2005, September 11, 2009, September 11, 2010, September 11, 2016, July 12, 2019, and July 12, 2024.
Current status: Good article


Regarding the article's current primary portrait

[edit]

The current portrait being used to portray Hamilton at the top of the article is not Hamilton. The portrait was painted by John Trumbull two years after Hamilton's death, meaning that the portrait is merely what Trumbull remembers Hamilton looking like. There are many other contemporary portraits of Hamilton to choose from, some of which were also painted by Trumbull, that provide a much more accurate depiction of Hamilton particularly in his later years. Thank you for your consideration. UnbearableIsBad (talk) 02:44, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also agreed Wcamp9 (talk) 02:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction to the Bill of Rights (after they were proposed and then became law)

[edit]

Is there a single reference that talks about Hamilton's reaction to the Bill of Rights after they were ratified and became law, or any discussion from him invoking them post-ratification? Or even his reaction to James Madison changing his mind and the new Congress formally proposing them? As shown in the Bill of Rights article, in Federalist No. 84 Hamilton was adamant that the Constitution was great as-is and amending it to add a bill of rights was unnecessary, but he was completely overruled and the first 10 amendments became law. But every source I can find and all the current content of relevant wiki articles only talk about his opposition before ratification, when the concept of bill of rights came up and Anti-Federalists were criticizing a Constitution without a Bill of Rights. A complete absence of content bringing up the two of them together post-ratification, nothing about his response to him losing the fight and the amendments becoming law, nothing about Hamilton mentioning them during government or politics, even in the Alien and Sedition Acts article where they were clearly relevant. 2600:1012:A021:8AD:B9F8:AE1F:34FF:D500 (talk) 05:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hamilton orphaned...

[edit]

First sentence of the Introduction states: Born out of wedlock in Charlestown, Nevis, Hamilton was orphaned as a child and taken in by a prosperous merchant.

I think there went something terribly wrong: 1. orphaned 2. taken in by a prosperous merchant

it's a direct contradiction to information found in other versions of wikipedia (see for example:

https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton

https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton

https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton )

better there is someone to recheck this... Joachim1970 (talk) 22:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2024

[edit]

Please add to the "Studies" section:

Siwisa James, Davida (2024), Hamilton Heights and Sugar Hill: Alexander Hamilton’s Old Harlem Neighborhood Through the Centuries, New York: Fordham University Press, ISBN 9781531506148 FordhamPress (talk) 20:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. That took me a while. Thanks for your contributions! Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 21:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]