User talk:Anticvobs

April 2021

Hello, I'm Pupsterlove02. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Malaria, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pupsterlove02 talk • contribs 14:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pupsterlove02 I re-add it together with with independent scientific source. Anticvobs (talk) 15:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Casey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paulius Stankevicius

The article Paulius Stankevicius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

0 incoming links. Born 1992. I guess that fails WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Edward Yardeni (Businessman)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Edward Yardeni (Businessman), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David Gerard (talk) 06:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello Anticvobs. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anticvobs. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anticvobs|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. David Gerard (talk) 06:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, good morning. I have went for vacation. I just noticed that you have talked to me on my talk page asking me whether I involve in UPE and I haven't disclose it. I followed wikipedia policy and I read most of it rules. I don't involve in paid edition as I know it's highly prohibited here in wikipedia. So also, I have no personal connection to pages I created. Though, I can see most of the articles that I wrote have been nominated for deletion. It's fine if they are not notable. Anticvobs (talk) 07:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kurt Newman

The article Kurt Newman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article. One third-party cite, to an interview in a trade magazine. WP:BEFORE shows passing mentions and self-sourced material, not the third party independent coverage need to have a WP:BLP here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 06:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adamu Garba II moved to draftspace

Please see log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lobin C. Lowe has been accepted

Lobin C. Lowe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pride Power List

Hello, Anticvobs,

Thank you for creating Pride Power List.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The History section should be rewritten so it does not appear as a list, though more like a paragraph or two within an article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 13:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Xenen1970 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 02:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pride Power List

Hello, Anticvobs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pride Power List, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Adamu Garba II

Hello, Anticvobs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adamu Garba II, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adamu Garba II

Hello, Anticvobs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Adamu Garba II".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 11:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]