User talk:Antianglonews

July 2024

Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I noticed that you recently removed content from Xiaoice without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wiiformii (talk) 01:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A very fast automatic bot. Your source (which is AngloNews from a stolen territory) doesn't mention anything about Xiaoice, and the propaganda, I mean news, is about speculation, as they themselves said "apparently".

Please, next time you edit this use your real account instead of hiding in another IP. Antianglonews (talk) 02:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Xiaoice. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Reuters has long been accepted as a reliable source by the community. Please do not remove properly sourced content. I have serious concerns over your username which suggests a WP:AGENDA or prejudice that may make constructive editing on the encyclopedia difficult. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} Bbb23 (talk) 13:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]