User talk:Anonymous9008

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Facial expression has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Facial expression was changed by Anonymous9008 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894978 on 2015-01-01T11:16:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Face, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 11:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Expression Interpretation hypothesis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Expression Interpretation hypothesis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=GkTaAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT207&lpg=PT207&dq="A+facial+expression+is+one+or+more+motions+or+positions+of+the+muscles+beneath+the+skin+of+the+face."&source=bl&ots=B8-RhUzTb8&sig=-bcQJlpTtlMdEDC37dnTXrjtAic&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tk2lVP3ABcLqar2kgJgC&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAw. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bazj (talk) 13:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Expression Interpretation hypothesis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Expression Interpretation hypothesis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://psychology.about.com/od/nonverbalcommunication/ss/understanding-body-language_2.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bazj (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by George.Edward.C was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Anonymous9008/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 08:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Anonymous9008, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 08:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Expression Interpretation hypothesis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Expression Interpretation hypothesis. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Microexpression. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Microexpression – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. bonadea contributions talk 11:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 14:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Expression Interpretation hypothesis. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article.

In addition you removed maintenance templates from the article - those templates indicate various issues with the article and they should not be removed until the issues have been resolved. bonadea contributions talk 15:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote on the talk page of the article: This article entirely differs from MicroExpressions and details a new breakthrough. providing guidelines that have not been stated as in Micro Expressions!.

Unfortunately, the only part of the article that could potentially be included in Wikipedia is the part about microexpressions. Wikipedia is not for announcing new breakthroughs or hypotheses that have not been exhaustively covered in reliable secondary sources. You were already told when you submitted the draft article for review that it needs sources, and so it's not surprising that the article is tagged for deletion when it was published without any changes, and without a single source. --bonadea contributions talk 15:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Expression Interpretation hypothesis. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 15:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Anonymous9008/sandbox

Hello, Anonymous9008. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]