User talk:Anno1407

Anno1407, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Anno1407! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. El_C 15:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just add the Anonymous Website, the website do not promote a product or a service.

You need reliable sources that prove it's really their website. El_C 15:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The website is legit anonymous forum branded with Anonymous logo, many people sing in for an account also the website first registration it s in 2012

That not enough for us to verify that it's really their official website. El_C 15:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Every group has an website this one it s the most trusted, even on vice it s articles written with this url, the removed was made for "nor should it be used for advertising or promotion" and this website do not promote any product or service

By all means, Vice works for me. Please cite directly. El_C 15:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here it s : https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/nzmgdx/knife-party-lrad "BFF status with infamous hacking squad Anonymous." it s link to the official website anonymoushackers.org can you leave the website link? or can i add it again?

Thanks, that works for me. El_C 15:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Your recent contributions appear to show that you are engaged in edit warring; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not override another editor's contributions. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 12:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 15:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 16:10, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 19:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]