User talk:Annamalai1973

Welcome!

Hello, Annamalai1973, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Contribute a word, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Contribute a word

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Contribute a word, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

The text is so incoherent that it's impossible to discern the actual subject of the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Annamalai1973/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:14, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Annamalai1973, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:14, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothyjosephwood was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Annamalai1973/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TimothyJosephWood 10:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no proper references for most of the things mentioned herein. Also the advertisement in the end, is against our guidelines as we do not allow any promoting of wares on article pages.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Annamalai1973/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 10:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Annamalai1973/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:20, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Invisible Art (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is nothing like a Wikipedia article at all

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Invisible Art and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Invisible Art". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 23 August 2017.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SUBMISSION BY : Annamalai "TOPIC : INVISIBLE ARTS" FROM MALAYSIA TO WIKIPEDIA

Invisible art refers to invisibility art form only visible under light spectrum 200nm to 500nm Electromagnetic spectrum Smart material Chromism. The Art form comes in the form of polymer paints Acrylate polymer - oil solvents soluble in thinnerThinner . When exposed to different wavelengths of light ;( i.e yellow light, blue light, purple light, black light, white light), different colours would appear accordingly to the naked eye . The invisible art application or paint is sprayed through an airbrush gun Airbrush liquid form and when it hits the surface of wall, floor ,ceiling or any surface it turns to powder and hardens immediately at a split second and are camouflaged into the background. The life span of these polymer invisible paints have surpassed 20 years - used mostly for interior rooms and exterior works , gardens, (they are not inks) Invisible art (paints) is commonly mistaken for invisible inksInvisible ink or marker pens UV marker . Nevertheless there have been rare moments where invisible inks have been used in exhibitions where The Guardian.com writes "Haywards gallery's invisible show: 'the best exhibition you'll never see' Featured artworks include a movie shot with no film, invisible ink drawings and a plinth once stood on by Andy Warhol; "It is not a joke," stressed the Hayward Gallery's director, Ralph Rugoff, as he announced details of a summer show devoted to invisible art. "This is the best exhibition you'll never see."" Klein, perhaps the first artist to explore the subject, in 1958 staged the first exhibition completely devoid of visible content" https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2012/may/18/hayward-gallery-invisible-show

Also see : "Invisible art: So, what does it say to you? The Hayward Gallery's latest show is dedicated to invisible artworks. Laura McLean-Ferris takes a tour and lets her imagination wander free" http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/invisible-art-so-what-does-it-say-to-you-7844887.html

There are also other forms of camouflage and invisible art , The New York Post writes "Master body painter Trina Merry transforms her subject’s bodies so that they perfectly camouflage in front of several well-known backdrops ;My work shows that experience. It uses marking the body to show what we put on our bodies to identify ourselves within a ‘tribe’ actually cause us to disappear. Merry may feel invisible at times, but when she takes her art into public spaces she makes herself vulnerable to the varying opinions of others. http://nypost.com/2016/10/10/this-artist-really-makes-her-models-disappear/

[1]"INVISIBLE ART" originates from well accepted thought of art form in the ASEAN region as well (aired on TV3 malaysian tv news malay news ; the word invisible art is seen being used in the tv interviews TV3, RTM2 television segment and in CHANNEL V ASEAN segment (year 2001 and 2003). TV3 the malay language TV news channel in Malaysia quotes in the airing "seni halimunan ini diusahakan oleh Syarikat Planet Visual Arts" ; "translation meaning : The invisible art is provided by a company called Planet Visual Arts" . This is evidenced by Google translator (malay to english) https://translate.google.com/#ms/en/seni%20halimunan which translates "seni halimunan" to "invisible art", the same also translates to "invisible art = seni tidak kelihatan = art which cannot be seen" .

The Malaysian Newspaper The Sun LIFE (dated 20 February 2000) highlights an article "The Art Of Camouflage" how underneath the cleverly airbrushed images lies another picture an invisible one that only surfaces later on with light exposure. The Malaysian newspaper The STAR (NORTH) dated 17 January 2001 speaks of an airbrush artist "Annamalai" who is known to be a wizard in this medium of invisible paints and painting who originates from Kedah and studied in Perak Institute of Arts who takes art to new dimensions when viewed differently during his working stint for a Japanese firm in Singapore. The DAY & NIGHT Magazine (23 - 29 April 2001) quotes the same airbrush illustrator "Annamalai" for his invisible art traits bringing fantasies to life.

INVISIBLE ART or "DIMENFUSION" fusing multiple dimensions in the art form and it glows autonomously or remotely, this is shown here for wikipedians https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bB9-EIpwKA . Dimenfusion is multi layered art (3 and 4 dimensional fusion) created in the same single art piece of space Three-dimensional space Fourth dimension in art . It is solely art form and hand drawn by using the airbrush device where the art created space has depth and protruding visual effects. Invisible Art or Dimenfusion "Dualities or Extra Dimensions" String theory#Extra dimensions is visible to the naked eye, the other part is invisible to the naked eye and only becomes visible upon exposure to certain wavelengths of light (200nm to 500nm). The 2 or multiple dimensions are mashed together to create various dimensional drawings in the same area - hence giving it the name "dimenfusion" . The art creation manipulates space to appear to have modified space "visually" when viewed by the viewer , visible at different angles and different spectrum of lights when applied. "3d or 4d 3D modeling is rarely explained where mashing of 2 or multiple dimensions being formed together is part of Art and Technology. Other fusion art museums and art organization that promotes emerging American and international fusion artists can be referred here. FusionArts Museum . AP Studio Art is a prime example where the learning curve in art technology is gradually increasing AP Studio Art.

One of the most featured invisible art proposal was the Painting with light on London's River Thames article written By Kate Springer of CNN, " Launched in 2016, the Illuminated River design competition called for a pioneering light scheme for central London's bridges along the River Thames, and received more than 105 entries from 20 countries", in picture 6 of 10 Quotes This proposal features a distinct installation on every bridge by different international artists. Pictured here 6 of 10 is 'Invisible ripples' by UK Painter Chris Ofili" http://edition.cnn.com/2016/12/19/architecture/london-illuminated-city-river-thames-london/index.html

The Invisible Art is also featured by Mark Cotta Vaz (Author), Craig Barron (Author) in their book being sold on AMAZON , it tells a story about " the birth of cinema, movie-makers have created stunning special effects by combining still "matte" paintings with live-action film. Matte painting techniques were closely guarded secrets that never left the studio lot. In this unprecedented retrospective, Mark Cotta Vaz and Craig Barron reveal the history of a visual effect that has defined movies as we know them-from Gone with the Wind and Citizen Kane to Star Wars and Titanic. Lavishly illustrated, The Invisible Art showcases the finest examples of now-rare matte paintings and unveils a century s worth of fascinating stories, legendary personalities, and cunning movie craft. Including a foreword by George Lucas and a CD-ROM that brings to life these moving pictures, this volume is packed with exclusive interviews and a narrative that time travels from the first pioneering "glass shots" to the dawn of digital technology. The definitive book for the consummate movie fan, The Invisible Art conjures a never-before-told story of film wizardry" https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Art-Mark-Cotta-Vaz/dp/0811831361

Over the years major television companies have been exposing the European Invisible Art with no factual visual footage highlighted here : http://www.bbc.com/news/av/entertainment-arts-18370818/invisible-art-is-there-more-to-it-than-meets-the-eye ; while the same mainstream media have been leaving out the factual Invisible Arts footage from Asia as highlighted here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bB9-EIpwKA ; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBihHWEMhqk ; So as responsible encyclopaedia , wikipedia has taken this opportunity to provide factual information on the topic of invisible art in a balanced fashion in this article.

3D is evolving into the future in many forms and dimensions. The New York Post writes "Artist uses Chelsea Manning's DNA to create 3D masks" http://nypost.com/2017/07/12/artist-uses-chelsea-mannings-dna-to-create-3d-masks/

Its quite clear that over the years, people and personalities in general have been having their way in art to make it invisible under many conditions or the very least camouflaged to blend in into existing dimensions and modifying their own dimensions of art aided with equipments, lightings, paints, science and technology .

My company (Planet Visual Arts Penang Malaysia) and I are closely connected to the subject matter and the words mentioned herein. I wish to request the editors to create proper entry for the words INVISIBLE ART & 3DIMENFUSION / DIMENFUSION

Notes to the editors : I wish to add the 4 videos (below) which belongs in the same group in the article. It will be impressive when it is read together with the main article above. I have taken out any form of advertising in my own 3 links so that it will suit for wikipedia use. The article will look complete with all 4 links pictured at the side with moving video with the main body of the article above. It will move the audience into deeper understanding into the article - never before seen it reveals the secrets of illusion and art under many conditions. Planet Visual Arts shows several videos below how bending light, paint and dimension really works.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space (This video belongs to someone else)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hB0xUV7bh4w (Notes to the editor : there is no copyright issue with this video, no advertising of contact details of company within the video. It is solely created by my company Planet Visual Arts)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bB9-EIpwKA (Notes to the editor : there is no copyright issue with this video, no advertising of contact details of company within the video. It is solely created by my company Planet Visual Arts)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO33W62cyuE&feature=youtu.be

(this video is specially created by Planet Visual Arts Penang Malaysia for Nat Geo and wikipedia for their respective sample use, Bending Dimension and Light in the reflection of a mirror , Notes to the editor : there is no copyright issues with this video, no advertising)

Thank you (malai) (Annamalai1973 (talk) 11:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Invisible Art, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 13:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Invisible Art (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToThAc was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also, I strongly urge you to refrain from calling out editors like what you wrote in an edit summary. Read WP:NOTESSAY before resubmitting this article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Invisible Art and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToThAc (talk) 21:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Draft:Invisible Art has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. ToThAc (talk) 21:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Invisible Art concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Invisible Art, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm Zefr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Moon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Zefr (talk) 03:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:34, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]