User talk:Anjalimarar95

Silent reversion

Hi there, re: this edit, your silent reversion is unhelpful. You should not revert another user without providing a clear explanation in your edit summary. You've restored Star Parivaar awards, which by consensus should not be included, as they are self-aggrandising, in-house awards given to people on the same network. That's the intellectual equivalent of me bragging that I got the "most handsome" award from my mother. You get what I'm saying? We only care about awards that are independent and notable.

There's also no indication that the GARV awards are notable (it appears to be a web-based award run on a Weebly.com site), and there's no indication that the "New Talent Awards" are of any value either. A notable award is an award that most people know about, and that has been around for years. Presumably someone would have created an article about this award years ago if it were of any value. You should be aware that "award mills" are prolific and are used to promote people who otherwise might not win a notable award. Obviously we can't let that happen, since Wikipedia is not a forum for promotion. Also, re: these additions, we don't use blogs or even IMDb as references, as anyone can start a blog or random website, and people can change information at IMDb. Please find mainstream websites, like news sites, magazine sites, etc. See also WP:UGC. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, re: this post, what other account did you use? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anjalimarar95, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Anjalimarar95! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harshad Chopda. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Diff: [1][2] For your edification, we are not required to list every award a subject has received, and per longstanding community preference (See WP:FILMCRITICLIST, for instance) we only care about notable awards. Notability must first be established through the creation of an article about the award, and that article must endure community scrutiny. Also, I believe that in October I asked you a question about what other accounts you've had, based on this post. I never received an answer. I'd appreciate one, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]