User talk:Animaljamfan123

Welcome!

Hello, Animaljamfan123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Yngvadottir (talk) 21:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to How You Like That has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: How You Like That was changed by Animaljamfan123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871284 on 2021-01-07T00:36:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Italic type, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jp×g 16:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Saturday Night Live, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 19:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Blackpink Arena Tour 2018 "Special Final In Kyocera Dome Osaka", you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. READ MOS:INOROUT. Sundayclose (talk) 17:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Church & Dwight, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Sweet Dreams (Beyoncé song). (CC) Tbhotch^™ 18:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Quotation mark, you may be blocked from editing. — BarrelProof (talk) 04:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

Perhaps my remark above was a bit hasty. Your edits don't necessarily seem to be vandalism, but many of them also don't seem to be improvements, and you are ignoring warnings and not providing edit summaries. — BarrelProof (talk) 20:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! and 2 bits of info

Hi Animaljamfan123, I'm not an administrator, but I saw at the administrators' noticeboard that you seem to have got off on the wrong foot. There is a bit of a steep learning curve here, because it's a big project involving a vast number of people from all over the world, so we've evolved rules and ways of doing things to minimize chaos and conflict. So I've put a late welcome at the top of this page; it has links to information that I hope you will find useful. (The bot that started this page actually leaves a space at the top for such a template.) And from what I saw at the noticeboard and in a very fast glance at your contributions, two hints:

Different countries use different varieties of English, so deciding what to do in cases where their spelling, vocabulary, and punctuation conflict is one of the reasons that English Wikipedia has a Manual of Style. In most such matters, the principle is: articles should follow the spelling and punctuation conventions of the variety of English that the article topic is naturally related to (that goes for articles on places, for example), or if there is no obvious association with a particular country, they use the variety of English that first showed up in the article (which is also why some article titles use US spelling and others use UK spelling, with a redirect being provided from the other spelling). But to avoid the reader or the editors getting whiplash, we try to use world-wide vocabulary where available, and we follow a standard set of rules on things like capitalization and punctuation at the end of things in quotation marks. For the quotation marks, we use "logical quotation": commas and periods/full stops go after the closing quotation marks except where the quote is a complete sentence in the original. So you have been un-fixing some of these, but I don't think anybody explained it to you: the relevant Manual of Style section is here.
Please write edit summaries. You can set your prerferences to remind you when you try to hit "save" without writing an edit summary. Without an edit summary, other editors have to guess what you were trying to do and why, and they may not see the mistake you were fixing, or understand why you believed it was a mistake. Remember, huge project, many editors, many different backgrounds; we all work together, so there will always be many people looking at changes you make to see whether you made a typo or whether they can further improve the text, and they can't read your mind to see what your intention was.

I hope this helps a bit. I'm glad you came along and started working with us. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Love Scenario

Your Romanization of "사랑을 했다" is wrong, as I had pointed out in my previous edit summary. As Revised Romanization of Korean#Transcription rules shows, "ㄹ" is Romanized as "r" when it is the initial consonant, and "ㅅ/ㅆ" is Romanized as "td" when it is the final consonant and followed by "ㄷ". Please stop changing it as your edits are now being disruptive. Ə XPLICIT 00:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BOLD-revert-discuss cycle

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 02:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shake It Up (American TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You've already got enough warnings about stuff like this that, at this point, you should know better. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bizaardvark, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 01:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sour (album)

About a part of this edit: Why are you linking a catalog number in the release history section of the article which uses the prefix tel:? That stands for telephone number ... clicking on the link will have one's computer (or other device) dial, or attempt to dial, a telephone number. Please stop adding that; you have done that at least three times in this article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 06:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned about using tel: in your edits, and I will state it again. DO NOT USE IT. I may get admin involved if this continues. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one adding that Animaljamfan123 (talk) 02:50, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not adding it, perhaps it's the editing app you are using to edit ... I'm going on the tags that are associated with your edits, like "mobile edit" and "mobile web edit". Do you preview your edits? ("Show preview" and "Show changes" are buttons I see along with "Publish changes" when I edit thru my browser.) Might want to do that and see that the preview matches what edits you have made. If anything is different from the edits, consider checking settings in the app or something. Also, do a malware scan on your device. The addition of "tel:" in linking numbers, whether they'd be actual telephone numbers or even something else (like the catalog number in the Sour album article I mentioned in my original post here more than a week ago), is a bit suspicious. Plus they show as external links, which normally shouldn't be in the body of an article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 06:13, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bunk'd, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 04:19, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The series finale of the show aired today Animaljamfan123 (talk) 04:28, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And how do you know this?! Surely you have a reliable source to back up your claim?... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do https://bunkd.fandom.com/wiki/Frien%27ds_Forever Animaljamfan123 (talk) 04:14, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not even close to a WP:RS (see: WP:NOTRS), and they've been wrong (multiple times, I think) before, claiming the show was cancelled after season #3, and again after season #4. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:11, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well this one is correct this time Animaljamfan123 (talk) 01:31, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Black Lives Matter, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 14:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sour (album). Again, this addition of "tel:" links to this article! Whether or not you know this is going on, it is still your responsibility to check your edits using the preview options before saving the edit. At least one on the WP:ANI noticeboard alerted you about this as well, and you should have received that. I will contact admin again the next time this happens. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:14, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how this keeps happening!!!!!!!! Animaljamfan123 (talk) 23:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I know you're making an effort to remove "tel:" links when you edit Sour (album), but your edits leave behind two of them total: one of them by the hotline number in the Promotion and release/Marketing section (which I see you have tried to remove the prefix), and one in the Release history section (the Brazil catalogue number, which isn't a phone number). Make sure you handle both those instances, and remove the extra text along with the brackets when doing so. Thanks for trying to take care of this. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, please use my removal of these as a guide in the future [1]. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:06, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Animaljamfan123 and use of "tel:" links in Sour (album). Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:51, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Sweet but Psycho" single status

Hi, I have reverted your two bold edits on "Sweet but Psycho" and discussed my reasons on the corresponding talk page here. Please discuss and come to a consensus there before re-adding the statement in the article. Thank you. — Angryjoe1111 (talk) 03:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding unsourced genres and making unnecessary wording changes

First of all, your addition of genres to Human (OneRepublic album) were entirely unsourced. Read WP:V—we do not add information to Wikipedia if it is not sourced. Then I notice you're re-arranging genres; changing the genre on Dancing with a Stranger to something the source does not even state (pop to dance-pop); and adding commentary on what the genre of Let's Get It Started is without a source in sight. Why do you think this is OK to do? Stop or you will be reported and potentially blocked. Adding unsourced genres and changing sourced genres is a no-no for any editor. You will be seen as a genre warrior and be blocked if you continue. Also, you have presented no reasoning for repeatedly changing "debut" to "first". In a lot of contexts, they mean the same thing. Debut is a widely understood music industry term. If you're changing it thinking "debut" is less common or somehow not correct, you are incorrect, and further widespread unexplained change of this will be reverted if I come across it. Regardless, an editor should not have to come ask you or speculate on why you have made the changes you have: please start leaving edit summaries and stop making unsourced changes. Thank you. Ss112 03:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How about you mind your own damn business???? Not everything on song articles, including genres, needs to be sourced, you should know that. Animaljamfan123 (talk) 03:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not everything needs to be sourced? WP:V, our most basic policy, begs to differ. I suggest you go read it before you edit another article. If you don't think everything needs to be sourced you are on the wrong website. You adding unsourced genres is the business of every editor who wants to make it their business because you're dragging down the quality of information by splashing unsourced opinions all over the website. Please get a grip and learn how Wikipedia works. I must admit I find it amusing you've told me to mind my business yet, out of the 475 edits you've made to Wikipedia, over a third of them have been reverted and you've received a dozen warnings from multiple other editors on this talk page alone. Did you miss all of that? Why didn't you tell them to mind their own damn business? Keep the same energy. Ss112 03:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No you need to get a grip. What you just said is so amusing I laughed my ass off, because I'm just expanding the song articles genres so people understand it more. So stay in school and mind your own business bitch. People's opinions matter. Animaljamfan123 (talk) 04:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what makes you think I'm going to "mind my own business" here or what makes you think you will continue to be allowed to add your unsourced opinions and BS to Wikipedia. Administrators will block you if you persist. Also, if you're going to try to insult somebody, try not to copy what they just said back to them. This really sounds like you're the age where you should be focusing on school and stop trying to play Internet tough guy by throwing pathetic insults at people because they told you the rules of the website you're editing. Ss112 05:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How old are you? 17? 20? 30? 40 perhaps? Yeah this sounds you're the age where you should be focusing on college and your 9-to-5 job at Starbucks instead of being a selfish, probably dateless guy on the internet pitifully insulting me, a 14-year-old Wikipedia editor. Animaljamfan123 (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure even at 14 I had better insults than throwing out random "reads" on the Internet at people to see what sticks. You can choose to stop with adding unsourced information or not. If not though, you will be blocked by an administrator. Your choice. Goodbye. Ss112 05:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that Animaljamfan123 (talk) 05:19, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021; adding unsourced content and attacking other editors

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:15, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three days for persistent refusal to comply with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and for infantile personal attacks. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and it is essential for editors to be able to deal with other editors in a civil and constructive way, even when they disagree. When the block is over please make sure you edit in accordance with policy, and don't tell editors who are trying to help you by informing you of policies to "mind their own business": it is the business of all editors to try to help make sure editing is in line with Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Animaljamfan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just trying to elaborate genres that were related to the songs, so there's is no reason some of them should have to be sourced Animaljamfan123 (talk) 14:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is incorrect. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to add a source every time you add a genre to a Wikipedia article. Failure to do so will get your account repeatedly blocked. Same goes for all the personal attacks and name-calling. You have to stop all of that immediately as well. Sergecross73 msg me 17:19, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I sincerely apologize for all of that, I was just trying to elaborate. Animaljamfan123 (talk) 17:31, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Animaljamfan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I'll source genres when I add them to songs articles on Wikipedia. Animaljamfan123 (talk) 22:22, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your personal attacks or otherwise tell how you will change your future conduct. I'm concerned that you lack the maturity needed to participate here; I hope that when the block expires that you show otherwise. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 22:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at How You Like That, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 01:20, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sergecross73 and 331dot: This editor is still fiddling with genres, still lying (as they did before) that certain genres (evidently ones they disagree with) are "not sourced" [2] despite there very clearly being a source later on in the article. Ss112 01:20, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, while it looks like it could be an honest mistake, it's still a pretty bad start when returning from a block about unsourced genre tinkering. Animaljamfan, you're in very thin ice for this sort of thing - you really need you be more careful. Sergecross73 msg me 12:25, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you would decide to alter my comment without explanation when I was trying to go lenient on you, but it seems to cement the suspicion another admin had that you simply don't seem to be ready for editing Wikipedia. Your account is blocked indefinitely. Maybe try going for an unblock when you've grown up a bit. Sergecross73 msg me 15:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. Sergecross73 msg me 16:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow what happened here???? Noahbecksleftab (talk) 00:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sergecross73: Hey Serge, looks like Animaljamfan123 is evading their block using the above account, Noahbecksleftab. Not even trying to hide it, as they commented here and they registered their new account after this one was blocked. All edits are tagged with "Mobile edit, mobile web edit, Visual edit" just like Animaljamfan's. Also editing the same articles, namely How You Like That and articles for songs by the girl groups Loona (PTT (Paint the Town)) and Twice, and also adding unsourced bits of information like this to others just like Animaljamfan. Also restored the same edit to Sony Music: Animaljamfan123, Noahbecksleftab. Ss112 01:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]