User talk:Aniekan7777

Welcome!

Hello, Aniekan7777, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Aniekan7777, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
How to write a great article
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 15:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Aniekan7777

A tag has been placed on User:Aniekan7777 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 15:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Aniekan7777 (talk) 15:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page does not fall under the speedy deletion criteria because it has all required informations

User page

Sorry, but your user page did not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself and your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV/resumé
a lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I believe that this page now meets all the requirements to be featured on Wikipedia.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BJ_Sam

Though It was rejected before because some of the sources used wasn't independent, reputable nor reliable but now all the cited sources mentioned in the draft are from independent, reputable, authoritative and widely read sources.

Please kindly review and approve this draft Aniekan7777 (talk) 22:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BJ Sam (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please indicate which criteria he meets for WP:NMUSIC. Note that there are multiple references pointing to the same press release that should be combined.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BJ Sam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BJ Sam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aniekan7777! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI notice

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I believe that this page now meets all the requirements to be featured on Wikipedia.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BJ_Sam

Though It was rejected before because some of the sources used wasn't independent, reputable nor reliable but now all the cited sources mentioned in the draft are from independent, reputable, authoritative and widely read sources.

Please kindly review and approve this draft Aniekan7777 (talk) 22:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please how do I add this category "Musicians or ensembles"? Aniekan7777 (talk) 21:08, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please how do I combine the multiple references pointing to the same press release? Aniekan7777 (talk) 21:32, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for all the corrections and editing on the article. I am really grateful. Please what else do I need to do? Thanks Aniekan7777 (talk) 10:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly help me Resubmit the article Aniekan7777 (talk) 12:26, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BJ Sam (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without improvement. Still doesn't indicate which criteria met in WP:NMUSIC

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BJ Sam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BJ Sam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please how do I indicate which criteria met in WP:NMUSIC ? Aniekan7777 (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:BJ Sam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add, if you are also the account User:Rubiesar, do not create a new account to evade your block. You must successfully appeal your block instead. Make the required disclosures; you entered into a legally-binding obligation to do so when you created an account here. Failure to disclose your relationship with the topic of your draft is what resulted in the block on this account and on Rubiesar. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aniekan7777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I own the two accounts and I am not being paid to work on the articleAniekan7777 (talk) 23:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thank you for the disclosure about the two accounts. However, you evaded the question about paid editing. You aren't being asked if you are paid to edit. You are asked if you are editing articles about clients who are paying you. That is a different question than what you answered, and that is what "paid editing" means here. You have been trying to publicize BJ Sam on Wikipedia for over two years, with the early versions of the draft using rather promotional language as befits a paid promoter. In addition, your other account Rubiesar apparently represents Rubies Music A&R, a business entity that engages in music promotion and management. So it stretches our credulity when you claim you are not being paid to promote your clients. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

hello, thanks for the great job you are doing, the article is about myself, the second account was created when I loss access to the first account, even now I don't have access to the email I used to create Rubiesar, I also own rubies A&R fb. I email WikiMedia earlier before rolling out and here is what they said "Thank you for contacting the Wikimedia Foundation. I understand that you are interested in having a Wikipedia article about yourself... "Should you decide to move forward with creating an article about yourself or an affiliated entity, you will maximize your chances of getting the article published if you maintain a neutral point of view, and cite reliable secondary sources supporting all information, as well as properly disclosing your affiliation with the subject of the article. As a new editor, your article will not be immediately published, but rather submitted as a draft in a queue for review by experienced editors."

I hope this information is useful. Sincerely, Nick Wilson Wikimedia Foundation".

please what else do I need to do?

At this point, you've lied to us multiple times about the nature of your edits. The claim that you lost access to Rubiesar seems like a further lie, as the account was actively editing up until it was blocked yesterday. If you file a new unblock request that explains how you will fully comply with WP:PAID and WP:SOCK and coming clean about the various falsehoods you've tried to sneak past us, you might be unblocked, but frankly at this point we have very little reason to trust you or to believe that you have any intent on this website other than self-promotion. I would suggest that you go about your PR work the normal way, in entertainment publications, and stop trying to submit your material to us. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: & @Anachronist: a new sock has popped up earlier today to continue to work on the draft. It's possible that the draft may need to be deleted if the socking continues. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:12, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evading your block by creating another account just digs you further into the hole you've already dug yourself into. I am giving you a chance to come clean. If you are BJ Sam, why wouldn't you just create an account under that name? Transparency is appreciated here, and you have not demonstrated it. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]