User talk:Angus Lepper/Archive 3

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Mujahideen

Regarding the article Mujahideen. When the article protection is lifted you will need to remove the images added by user:Klass, as he has uploaded them all as "Public Domain- selfcreated" (PD-self) which is highly doubtful, plus they fall under the db-banned (speedy deletion- blocked user upload) category and therefore i proposed them all for speedy deletion. --noclador 13:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Callelinea

I dealt with it. She's blocked for an hour so she can cool down. Circeus 18:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Angus Lepper! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel 04:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Frank Anchor, Hpsander456, Thugman123, and others

Re your message: Yes, the whole group is rather suspicious. They don't seem to be doing all that much harm, so I'm inclined to let them be. Their catagory is up for deletion. -- Gogo Dodo 04:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Andrew Robertt

Hi. I just noticed that you beat me to editing Andrew Robertt after it was vandalised. However, you tagged it {{db-bio}} after it was vandalised. Just to let you know, since Andrew Robertt wasn't a candidate for speedy deletion before it was vandalised, you accidentally marked a (somewhat) notable article for speedy deletion. Thanks, Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 16:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There wasn't really anything wrong with what you did; by posting it as a candidate for speedy deletion you ensured that some administrator would eventually go to the page and revert it. :-) Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 16:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of response to user above: Oops! Thanks! ;-) Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 17:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 141.151.187.65

That's what I'm here for. They made the mistake of vandalizing WP:AIV, number one way to get the admins' attention! GDonato (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serial vandal at Robert Gilbert (chemist)

Thanks for reverting. Any way of getting this pest banned, particularly in view of his comments on the talk page? Tony 14:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3R warning

I am merely removing vandalism: unsourced, speculative OR. An Admin themselves removed the same data and agreed it has no place on the page. You may wish to look at his talk page. I believe removing vandalism is not a violation of 3R, is it? The Clawed One 16:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And as a note, I report both of the users rv'ing me for vandalism an hour ago, but nothing has happened with that yet. What should I do? Should I continue to revert them, or wait the the vandalism report to be resolved? I'd like to think so, but I'm not entirely sure an Admin endorsement is going to help that much. The Clawed One 16:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angus, I remember we've had discussions before and I eventually understood and agreed with your comments. Again I've seen you get pulled into a skirmish on a Transformer page. I wanted to reassure you that I have not been blindly reverting. Each time (almost every time) I have attempted to remedy the alleged shortcoming, referencing, removing speculative wording, etc. Please don't think that I've been simply reverting.

My last edit sourced the page. Whether or not TCO will again mass-delete the section or not I do not know. He does not seem to have any interest in fixing the article.

And you know my stand on vandalism... that's how we first "met" on Wiki, IIRC. I'd be offended at the "accusation" by TCO if I didn't find every word he writes meritless.

Thanks for your involvement in this article. VigilancePrime 16:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "source" he provided was Answers.com quoting Wikipedia. Enough said. The Clawed One 16:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. Noted and accepted that mistake already. He's so vicious about this stuff... VigilancePrime

No problem. I appreciate your non-involvement. ;-) Remind me, we CAN course IMDB, right? Here's the spot I'm looking at. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VigilancePrime (talk • contribs).

Doubtful, it's user-submitted data. I've asked about it before, and no, you can't. The Clawed One 16:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. I'm not entirely sure why the user concerned decided to make that particular comment, as I didn't have anything to do with the article concerned in any way...! You, on the other hand, clearly had it coming by amending their edit! Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 19:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was BOLD!

Fixed up an error with a refrence in the HP7 page, thanks for the friendly push! =D - Biomech

Barnstar

Thank you so much for the barnstar. I really appreciate getting the recognition--it was a lot of work! MLilburne 11:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DataTag

Angus-

You tagged my only submission to Wikipedia because it sounded like a commercial for the product DataTag. I'm new to all this and totally overwhelmed. I asked the company for a blurb about their product beccause it is so great and I did not want to do them an injustice by writing about their product when I'm not an expert. I just know that I love it, and I think others should hear about it.

What can I do to get this page put back up. I would be happy to revise the content, but I'm so overwhelmed by this whole thing. It took me 20 minutes just to figure out how to write to you! I think that your response will show up on my page, so I'll look there to hear from you.

Thank you for your time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Emt bayarea (talk • contribs).

re Image:Book cover - robert's rules of order orig 1876 edition.jpg

Well, I think it is probably fair use, maybe, in Robert's Rules of Order, but not in the other article and the non-article spaces. For Wikipedia:Process is important I will hand-draw an approximate copy. This will not be suitable for article space, though, so it definitely needs to be removed from Student Congress - and from the non-article spaces, for now. Herostratus 02:50, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism off of my user page today, your fast response was much appreciated Trusilver 17:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

I started a thread on the whole situation at Julio Lugo on WP:AN/I. Pats Sox Princess 21:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA formatting

Hi Angus. Thought I'd remind you that each line has to start with a # to preserve the numbering. Best wishes, --John 17:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I invite you to inform me when next you stand. Best wishes, --John 19:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA has been closed

I have closed your RfA. I am afraid there was no consensus to promote you to adminship. Please address the concerns given in the RfA and feel free to reapply in the future. --Deskana (banana) 00:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better luck next time Angus. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 16:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome for the support. :) Don't worry, as Deskana said above, just listen to what was said, and try again later. Acalamari 16:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

suggesiont: some of the AfD debates attract little attention, & another eye is much needed for them.DGG (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry to see this. Please try again soon! Giggy _U^CP 00:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're more than welcome. I'll be there next time.-- The_socialist ^talk? 10:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

You're very welcome, and I'm very sorry to hear about your failed RfA. One can only improve after the comments and suggestions that other people have left for you. My RfA also failed a few days before you set yours up :-S. Lra drama 14:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon Articles

My apologies on the Pokemon articles. This guy is just really ticking me off. I've stopped. Spigot Map 11:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The images are important...The images are releated to the article. And that girl is removing the images , the japanese poster shows the difference with the american poster, and the pikachu the movie logo show the changes throughout each movie, the logo for the third movie has the release date for japan ex: Pikachu the Movie 2000, and the fourth logo has 2001 the year the fourth movie was released, and the fifth one has Pikachu the Movie 5th which is the fifth movie, and the tenth movie has Pikachu the Movie 10th which is the tenth movie (Workadded 12:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Just a heads up, SpigotMap is messing around the Pokemon movie articles again. Workadded