User talk:Aneelperv

Speedy deletion nomination of Waleed Dilawar Chughtai

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Waleed Dilawar Chughtai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kolbasz (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Waleed Dilawar Chughtai. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Kolbasz (talk) 14:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Aneelperv. You have new messages at Shashwat986's talk page.
Message added 15:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Shashwat986 → talk 15:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Waleed Dilawar Chughtai. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. This is the second time you've removed the template. Shashwat986 → talk 15:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Waleed Dilawar Chughtai, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 16:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Waleed Dilawar Chughtai. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AllyD. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waleed Dilawar Chughtai (2nd nomination) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! AllyD (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]