User talk:Andyjsmith/Archive 11

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

The reversion of my content on the Talk page for SpaceX's starship

Greetings.

You reverted content I posted on the SpaceX Starship's talk page, and your reason was "This is not a place for rants, especially not silly ones."

According to your notification to me on my talk page, if I believe you have made a mistake, I am to notify you here on your talk page.

I believe you have made a mistake, as what I posted includes a link to a rather-long playlist of actual evidence showing what I stated is true. It is not a rant, nor is it "silly".

Please restore my content. Thank you. Kerry, Son of Spyro (talk) 09:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

@Kerry, Son of Spyro See WP:TPG: "Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject". You will not find a place in Wikipedia for your strange ideas because they're opinions, not facts, and aren't backed by the kind of reliable evidence that Wikipedia requires. Andyjsmith (talk) 12:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

So math, science, technical expertise... all not acceptable?

Instead you rely on popular opinion? In that case, WP:TPG is wrong and all of wikipedia is personal views on a subject. Kerry, Son of Spyro (talk) 04:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

To be clear, in the videos I linked, actual math is used to calculate the various problems involved. You are dismissing these scientific facts without even looking at them because they do not reflect popular opinion and instead propose "strange ideas".

Do you remember back in 2021 when there was that big scandal about how a woman was finding that writers had made revisionist content here on Wikipedia about World War II, saying that Adolf Hitler had done nothing wrong? Yeah, you're doing that again.

You are equivocating actual math and science to conspiracy theory, and committing a logical fallacy. The truth, my friend, is stranger than fiction. And the idea that Starship is safe, is pure fiction.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Not an echo chamber. Kerry, Son of Spyro (talk) 04:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of Folkewall

Hello there. Answer to your "The only references to "folkewall" I can find on the web are to wikis and self published site. Nothing that indicates notability". Please see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Folkewall#Secondary_sources_and_notoriety the result of an ultraquick search I've done. Gives a list of articles (some academics) & pages that talk about the folkewall and/or use it as one of their references. I agree that the page could be improved, and yes the website holon.se has disappeared as such. That's no good reason for deleting the page. Tha,k you for your attention. 91.164.158.11 (talk) 21:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Gravity

Re the film. No is it not Kessler Syndrome but if the film wants to claim that it is then let them have their own way as it is just fiction and gets the point across. Kessler Syndrome is a gradual increase in debris over many years as existing debris occasionally hits other satellites and the total debris exponentially builds up to give higher and higher chances of being impacted. In the film Gravity one spacecraft is hit and the debris from this single incident causes all the other damage which is the space station being extremely unlucky to be in the orbital cone of debris from this collision.

I had not seen this article when I did my post but it sums up the issues. https://www.inverse.com/science/gravity-movie-kessler-syndome#:~:text=What%20is%20Kessler%20syndrome%3F,off%20a%20gradual%20chain%20reaction.&text=In%20Gravity%2C%20lead%20astronauts%20Ryan,outside%20of%20International%20Space%20Station.

Not going to revert or edit the article but I thought it was worth mentioning just incase you are curious. Lets put this one down to fiction over fact. Mtpaley (talk) 21:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: ExOrdo

Hello Andyjsmith, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ExOrdo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7: article makes a clear claim of significance; G11: not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)