User talk:Andrzej Rybkiewicz

Andrzej Rybkiewicz, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Andrzej Rybkiewicz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

These REFs are not self promotional links. These are links to flights schedules, especially to the flights booking system which is showing the dates of flights, airlines, hours and aircraft type in some cases. These REFs is a proving for charter routes.

You have to undo all your edits and make it back to versions made by me. You are not able to delete the suitable REFs which are proving charter routes.

Filips3 (talk) 12:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Filips3 your reference links are pure propaganda. Those sites you are referring doesn't provide plane tickets but holidays packages! Advertising, Self-promotion, soapbox is not allowed on Wikipedia. Please keep our wikipedia garbage free. Thanks

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Katowice Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Ed6767 talk! 16:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting REFs

Let me explain you that I am not any worker of any of these companies. Please check the sources. Skyscanner does not provide any info about eg. Enter Air routes. As you can see at Itaka or Rainbow schedules, all flights are noted there. Please search e.g. for Katowice - Zakynthos and then it will show you planned routes for future as well as airline operating this route and hours.

@Filips3: You are not using Rainbow as reference, only itaka and tui... plus the links have no info at its ends. You can use opodo for enter air or just fix the enter air section but you are making the whole article about itaka and tui I have been checking before making edits and you adds those links. Is a normal use seo agencies use wikipedia when creating backlinks and Im 100% sure you are doing just that!

There are some rainbow's REFs named "Charter Flights charterflights.r.pl You have to be aware of that all airports in the World are using travel agencies charter flights booking systems to prove charter flights out of the airport. If you see that some routes are operating also by rainbow, feel free to add REF to rainbow flight schedule. That is normal that I added most of the REFs, because I am the main editor of KTW Airport Wikipedia site.

It makes no difference what travel agency is provided in REF, because it is REF! REF is something that confirms the route. I would understand you, if I was putting travel agencies in the article, but I just add them to prove the routes as there is no other way.

Look at the other World's airports. Most of the airports use system like that. You just came there and started to delete the content. We are there to provide an actual schudeule out of the airports, and you are there just to devaste it! Stop doing that. A few days ago, another user explained you that these REFs are ok.

REFs 2

I just though that the trouble can be in seeing the content of the REFs.

Please, could you tell me what you EXACTLY see, when you enter the REFs provided by me? You said about a blank page. What do yopu exactly see? throttleKTW 19:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost on You Music (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

Articles other than list articles should not consist primarily of very long lists. See Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The list of names and the discography are too long.

The label is likely notable, but this draft does not establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lost on You Music and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lost on You Music, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost on You Music (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lost on You Music and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lost on You Music, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lost on You Music

Hello, Andrzej Rybkiewicz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lost on You Music, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lost on You Music

Hello, Andrzej Rybkiewicz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lost on You Music".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost on You Music (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for your submission! Some of the issues raised by previous reviewers still apply to this draft, namely that a lot of the prose is written in a way that seems like advertising for the company. For example, "diverse range of artists from around the world, representing various electronic music genres" could be reduced to simply "artists working in various genres". The point about the school in Sierra Leone is also repeated twice unnecessarily. Let me know if you have any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lost on You Music and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 11:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your comments TechnoSquirrel69, could you help me to correct the article? I think I have a problem of interpretation because to me it doesn't sound like an advertisement, it's just that what Lost on You does is important and deserves a place here. It's been more than a year and I'm still making the same mistakes, it's the first time I write an article here. Andrzej Rybkiewicz (talk) 21:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]