User talk:Andelocks

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Strength (band), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Strength (band) was changed by Andelocks (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-11-08T07:23:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1953 Fitzgerald Report for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1953 Fitzgerald Report is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1953 Fitzgerald Report until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sailsbystars (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wording at Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

About your comment that states that the descriptions of Kennedy in the opening sentence portray him in a "negative light," allow me to post a notice from the top of the talk page (which you may or may not have already seen):

"Q: Why does the article say Kennedy 'is known for advocating anti-vaccine misinformation'? A: There is a consensus that numerous reliable sources describe Kennedy as promoting anti-vaccine misinformation. This wording is the result of a 2023 RfC."

I hope this (somewhat) clears things up. If not, feel free to view the aforementioned RfC here if you so please. JeffSpaceman (talk) 01:54, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]