User talk:AnastasiaEye

Speedy deletion nomination of Dehko (Duo)

Hello AnastasiaEye,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dehko (Duo) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 11:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay @Willbb234: Understood. This means I need to read more of polices and guidelines I guess. AnastasiaEye (talk) 07:11, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but more specifically the notability guidelines and other information about notability. Thanks, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 08:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Schultz (Entrepreneur) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Matthew Schultz (Entrepreneur), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Note that we cannot cite blogs or other self-published sources in our articles, especially not in biographies. All the cited sources are either blogs or paid marketing posts created to prop this person up (something subject sometimes do to promote themselves in Google results). It's sometimes not easy to differentiate between a real and a marketing source, but I would very much recommend starting over and summarizing only what reliable secondary sources such as newspapers have to say. If you have any questions, come ask at the Teahouse.

– Thjarkur (talk) 12:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ron Baratono (Author) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron Baratono (Author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Baratono (Author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 10:19, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Galuku

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Galuku, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CatcherStorm ^talk 12:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 13:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Schultz (entrepreneur) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Schultz (entrepreneur) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Schultz (entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 09:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arch Hades

Hello, AnastasiaEye. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arch Hades".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lacrosse Unlimited

Hello, AnastasiaEye. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lacrosse Unlimited".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eliza Neals

Hello, AnastasiaEye. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eliza Neals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eliza Neals

Hello, AnastasiaEye. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eliza Neals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 09:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eliza Neals

Hello, AnastasiaEye. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eliza Neals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]