User talk:Anantashakti

Namaste from Kauai

Aloha Anantashakti! Nice page you have here. We like the Suli at the top. Congratulations! Aum, Himalayan Academy Publications 19:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I haven't got confirmation from the mailing list people, but for the moment I'll assume that User:Himalayan Academy Publications is indeed who they say they are and that you have permission to upload these images. Wikipedia isn't a image storage space and uploaded images should be inserted into relevant articles. Since the images are under a free license, I recommend you upload to Wikimedia Commons instead so all Wikimedia Foundation sites can use them. (This would also mean they don't neccesarily have to be used in articles if uploaded there). - Mgm|^(talk) 10:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Thank you for pointing out that images should be inserted into relevant articles right away, Mgm. Will do so in the next few days. I do have permission to upload the images, of course. Uploading to Wikimedia Commons in the future sounds like a good idea. Thanks again! - Anantashakti 17:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding your pictures to various Hinduism-related articles. They may have some artistic merit, but they have no encyclopedic value. Thank you. rudra 02:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm new at this and have been adding images to Wikipedia articles mostly for practice. Just trying to learn so I appreciate all your comments. While some of the images may be decorative, it appears to me that pictures in general do provide a service to the readers. I'm a visual reader myself. Perhaps a more careful selection of pictures would be appropriate. Discussing the idea of using images on the article's talk page before adding them, suggested by Buddhipriya below, is also the way to go. - Anantashakti 17:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Namaste. Thank you for participating in Wikipedia. I have noticed some of your image contributions showing up on some of the pages I keep on my watch list. One of the pictures you uploaded is now in use on Ganesha, a page I follow, and I think the picture looks very nice there, a good illustration for a specific idea in the article.

Since you are adding quite a few images, it is possible that some concern may be raised about promotional efforts related to the organization from which the pictures are coming. Some editors are very sensitive to the problem of spam on Wikipedia. For general information on the problem of spam on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam.

I am not accusing you of spamming, so please do not take it that way. I mention it only to let you know that in some cases others may interpret use of images that are tied to a particular source as a form of spamming.

One way to reduce the chance your images will be seen in a negative way would be to discuss the idea of using them in an article on the talk page before adding them, to test the waters. That is something that I sometimes do when I am approaching an article for the first time.

I would be happy to discuss any of these ideas with you further. Thanks again for participating!

Buddhipriya 03:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Namaste. Thank you for the kind words and advice. Can definitely use both since I'm so new at this. It appears that I may have uploaded too many images a few days ago. Never occurred to me that this could be interpreted as spamming. Was only hoping to enhance the impact of the already existing, beautifully written articles. Uploading many pictures at once was mostly for practice, when I had some free time (I'm an academic and a scientist).

Since it appears that images uploaded to Wikipedia are to be used right away, I'll move all the unlinked images over to Wikimedia Commons. This should take care of the urgency of linking pictures to articles. I will also follow your advice about mentioning the idea of using new images in an article on its talk page. Please let me know if you have further suggestions. Many thanks again! - Anantashakti 17:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify: uploading the pictures per se was not spamming. The spamming had to with the effective linking to the Himalayan Academy site, i.e. exploiting Wikipedia for free advertising and publicity. Your action does not scale: if you do it, why can't anyone else with another site/organization/entity to promote do it too? Hence also the issue of the pictures having encyclopedic value: merely decorating articles doesn't scale either. Please consider carefully what you want to do, in relation to WP:NOT. rudra 05:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. So the links in the copyright statement raise a red flag about spamming. If the pictures were only copyrighted to the Himalayan Academy without links, the issue would not exist. The links can easily be removed. The only goal here is to enhance the value of already existing articles with pictures and appropriate text. I do appreciate your comments and patience. - Anantashakti 22:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is wonderful to have access to good illustrations for the articles, and I am sure that the generosity of the Himalayan Academy will benefit many articles. I am unsure myself about the details of the rules about the various types of copyright and am benefitting from following the discussions about these examples. There is a potential problem in the use of a role account by the Himilayan Academy that also should be sorted out before too much dependency is placed on links to that account. Since Wikipedia prohibits role accounts it is possible that the account will be deleted, in which case the copyright issues perhaps will be affected. Buddhipriya 22:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:KarmaHA.jpg

File:KarmaHA.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Karma AS.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Karma AS.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saiva Siddhanta Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gurudeva. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saiva Siddhanta Church, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Agama and Pluralism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Spiritual Park in Mauritius.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Spiritual Park in Mauritius.jpg, which you've attributed to Paramacharya Sadasivanathaswami. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 03:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Woman sitarHA.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Woman sitarHA.jpg appears to be missing information as to one (or more) of the following :

The author or creators of the work, (including information as to the author's lifespan).
Where and how this particular version was obtained.
When the work was created,

If you did provide such information, it is currently confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Anantashakti}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Monks of Kauai's Hindu Monastery.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Monks of Kauai's Hindu Monastery.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Monks of Kauai's Hindu Monastery.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Monks of Kauai's Hindu Monastery.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Saiva Siddhanta Temple. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. If you want to move the page, get concensus by starting a move discussion on the talk page of the article. See WP:RM#CM for details. Whpq (talk) 21:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]