User talk:An anonymous username, not my real name/Archives/2022/November

Your GA nomination of Japanese fire-bellied newt

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Japanese fire-bellied newt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Irreligion in Malaysia

On 4 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Irreligion in Malaysia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that atheists in Malaysia are often threatened with rape and murder? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Irreligion in Malaysia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Irreligion in Malaysia), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Reply in the page's talk not on user's

I have moved our conversation to the Battle of Malacca page. The content of our conversation does not belong on a user's page, it should be on the page that we are discussing about. You can reply me there. Danial Bass (talk) 22:47, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

I have re-included my minor sourced content which you removed again in the Battle of Malacca page. Personally letting you know, Wikipedia is a place where any contributor can add useful sourced information. I have never in my long time in Wikipedia saw any contributor just come into a page, removed nearly everything in a page (which is okay), but then tell another contributor not to add or remove anything, I know you are trying not to be rude, and I really believe you but its actually rude to do this honestly. It would be okay if this was your personal blog/book but its Wikipedia, where many people work together as a team. So respectfully, do not remove my minor edits. When I worked with other editors its really normal for each other to give way and come to an agreement, I hope we can come at one peaceful on too. And more so, my edits are really minor compared to yours. Danial Bass (talk) 08:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Danial Bass, I did not see this until just now, and I suppose I'm beating a dead horse at this point, but I would just like to apologise for being rude. I was not trying to make Wikipedia my personal blog, I only thought there were issues with including the content, which I now realise there were not. Please forgive me. An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for being understanding. I appreciate this, and I hope you have a nice day Danial Bass (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2022 (UTC) Danial Bass (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Syphilis in sub-Saharan Africa

On 16 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Syphilis in sub-Saharan Africa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a lack of screening for pregnant women with syphilis in sub-Saharan Africa is associated with increased infant mortality? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Syphilis in sub-Saharan Africa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Syphilis in sub-Saharan Africa), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Malacca (1641)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Malacca (1641) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Minor Note

From what I'm seeing (which might be wrong) you are manually AfDing articles. This is totally optional and just my personal preference, but IMHO WP:TWINKLE, which you can find in your preferences, is a very convenient, semi-automated way to AfD (which you are frequently doing), revert vandalism, and tag articles. It might be worth considering, as IMO it's quicker. Of course, this is just my personal opinion; many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

I've though about it before. If you think it's helpful, I'd be glad to try it out. Thank you! An anonymous username, not my real name 22:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carsosaurus

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carsosaurus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 20:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Prince Bernhard's titi monkey

The article Prince Bernhard's titi monkey you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Prince Bernhard's titi monkey and Talk:Prince Bernhard's titi monkey/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 02:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)