User talk:Amyabaker

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Amyabaker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cntras (talk) 07:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Noddle article

I belatedly see that you requested feedback on this at Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_August_19#User:Amyabaker.2FNoddle but that noone replied. I am very sorry to have to say that your draft article was speedily deleted and has been temporarily restored while it is being discussed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 September 3. In my opinion the matter should have been discussed with you at a much earlier stage. I might be able to help, but I am not sure I can, if you want to try and take this forward. If so, plaese get in contact. Thincat (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thincat, thanks for getting in touch. I was wondering what had happened to my article but since I'm such a newbie I thought maybe it was all part of the wiki process. I see there have been some changes to my original article, which is totally fine. Is it possible to get it published on Wikipedia now, or is it still pending approval from other members? Thanks! Amy

Well, things like this are supposed to be be handled by a "wiki process" though in my personal opinion on this occasion the process has strayed very far from what should happened. A discussion is still taking place at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_September_3 which I fear you may find extremely confusing but you are welcome to take part in it. Suffice it to say that everyone thought your draft was not suitable to be made into an article as it stood (because it read too much like an advertisement). Most people thought you (and others) should be allowed to continue improving the draft and many people thought it should not have been deleted in the first place.

Some very helpful editors got the draft temporarily restored and then have made what they hope are improvements sufficient to allow the improved draft to be kept. If this is successful (and my guess is that it will be) then it will regain its status as a draft. Only after this can it be decided whether it can be moved to become a normal article, no longer a draft. However, the deletion/discussion has already broken several "rules" and it is possible that the discussion will end up with the draft actually being made into an article directly. I suggest you read (and comment if you like) at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_September_3 and then keep at eye on it to see what happens. These discussions normally last at least 7 days and I suspect this one may well end tomorrow (10 September).

On a technical matter, any article would likely be called Noddle (credit report service) and there would be a link to it from Noddle. Thincat (talk) 11:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thincat, thanks for your speedy reply. Ill check out the Deletion_review/Log and see if I can make sense of it all. Hopefully the draft is made into an article directly sometime over the next couple days :)

Hey again Thincat, thanks again for all your help. Just wondering if there is a way I can be updated on when the Noddle Wiki site is actually posted and gone live? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.165.198 (talk) 11:09, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again Thincat, thanks again for all your help. Just wondering if there is a way I can be updated on when the Noddle Wiki site is actually posted and gone live?

The deletion review not only overturned the original speedy deletion but resulted in the revised draft article being moved to "mainspace" at Noddle (credit report service). Since you have only edited Wikipedia concerning this topic, people may wonder whether you have some association with the service or the firm. If you do then it is recommended (but not required) that you declare your interest on your user page and at Talk:Noddle (credit report service). In any case it is quite OK to continue editing the article. A particularly good example of best practice is at User:Joedesantis. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Best wishes. Thincat (talk) 09:38, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BarbaraAstman.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BarbaraAstman.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]