User talk:Amrodiabb

La Reina

La Reina is Egypt’s first Fashion Rental E-commerce platform. It was started by Amr Diab and Ghada Eltanawy in April 2016. The founders are originally a Mechanical Engineering graduates from the American University im Cairo. The startup has raised a seed round of $1M from local and regional investors and has been one of the pioneers of Fashion E-commerce in Egypt and the MENA region. La Reina has been featured on several platforms including but not limited to Forbes, Vogue UK, Vogue India, Vogue Australia and Egypt Daily News, etc... Amrodiabb (talk) 05:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:La Reina Logo.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:La Reina Logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Passenger pigeon (talk) 00:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

La Reina Gowns moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, La Reina Gowns, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of La Reina Gowns

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on La Reina Gowns, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 17:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello Amrodiabb. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amrodiabb. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Amrodiabb|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 17:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Praxidicae:, I would like confirm to that i'm not directly or indirectly compensated for my edits or anything i write, Thanks.

Let me advise you to again read WP:COI and WP:PAID because your username tells a very different story. Praxidicae (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae:, didn't check the WP:COI before. I have moved it to Draft, it's true and am not saying i'm not one of the founders of the company. what do you suggest?

Abide by the policies set forth in the link above and disclose as required. Pretty straightforward. Praxidicae (talk) 17:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:La Reina Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:La Reina Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]