User talk:Ammitchell

Welcome!

Hello, Ammitchell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 05:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Harry Weller, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

76Strat ^String da _Broke da (talk) 08:29, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pete Sonsini.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! T.I.M^(Contact) 18:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Pete Sonsini.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 02:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello! Ammitchell, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Pete Sonsini.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 03:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ammitchell. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Skamecrazy123 (talk) 16:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Neutral Point of view

Just a quick question. Have you had a look at WP:BETTER? I know it may be long, but it does contain a wealth of information on improving articles, including how to write an article in an encyclopaedic tone. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Skamecrazy123 I have referenced WP:BETTER, but I can take a look at it again in more detail.Ammitchell (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you wouldn't mind doing that, then I can go through the article and see if I can identify the problems that have caused it to be rejected. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Slight change of plan

I've just had an idea which may make the whole process quicker. I have copied the page into my sandbox, where I will go through it and edit it. Once I have done that, and you have had a look at it, I can explain where the problems occurred, what you need to do to avoid it in future, and you can resubmit it. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Skamecrazy123 I would love to take a look at any changes you suggest to improve the article. Thanks! My most current edits are in my sandbox http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ammitchell/sandbox

follow up

Hello Skamecrazy123, just wanted to see if you had any suggestions for my aforementioned article? Thank you!

Yes I do. Sorry for taking so long. I've had a crazy week off wiki. I've got a number of things for you to do, so I'll go through them with you bit by bit. If you want to work on the copy you have in your sandbox, then we won't have conflicting editions.

The first thing we will go through is the language of the article (basically, how the article is written).

Simplify language. Go through the article and remove any content that's surplus to requirements. For example, in the Business Career section, the sentence "Sonsini joined venture capital firm New Enterprise Associates (NEA) in 2005" could be reduced to"Sonsini joined New Enterprise Associates in 2005".

Remove what are known as peacock terms (peacock terms are terms used to promote the subject of the article without plainly summarizing the source of the term). For example, the word prominent can be removed from "Pete Sonsini is a prominent Venture Capitalist based in the Silicon Valley area of California"

Remove extraneous words. Words such as "also" and "however", and phrases such as "due to the fact that" and "in the year" are prime examples.

Make corrections to grammar and spelling.

If you can get started with this lot then that would be brilliant. As always, if you have any questions, drop me a line on my talk page (I'm certain I will be a lot less busy than I was last week). On an unrelated note, if you could add any new questions to the bottom of my talk page rather than the top, it would be very much appreciated. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 01:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Updated article in sandbox

Skamecrazy123 Thank you very much for the above suggestions. I have used your tips to clean up the article. The update is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ammitchell/sandbox

Let me know what else I can do to ensure the article is accepted. THANK YOU!

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Harry Weller

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Harry Weller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DGG ( talk ) 04:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harry Weller for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Weller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Weller until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pete Sonsini concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pete Sonsini, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Pete Sonsini

Hello Ammitchell. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Pete Sonsini.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pete Sonsini}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:NEA Logo 1.5inch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NEA Logo 1.5inch.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]