User talk:Amingon

June 2024

Hello, I'm Rkieferbaum. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Virgin Queen without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rkieferbaum (talk) 02:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rkieferbaum. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ryan Newman without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rkieferbaum (talk) 02:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Suite francaise, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is one of a number of disruptive redirects. Drmies (talk) 03:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Remsense. I noticed that you recently removed content from French Revolution without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Remsense诉 03:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Archives908. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Potential superpower have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Archives908 (talk) 00:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continued disruption

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Wizmut (talk) 03:27, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that in this edit to List of countries and dependencies by area, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 05:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Mary I of England, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 08:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mary I of England, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 08:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Remsense ‥ 论 08:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Olivia Sanabia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Olivia Sanabia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Sanabia. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Philip_II_of_Spain.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]