User talk:American Clio

Welcome!

Hello, American Clio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Neo-Jay (talk) 01:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A land without people for a people without a land

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A land without people for a people without a land, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.liberationgraphics.com/ppp/Redeem_the_Land.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on "A land without people for a people without land", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

unnecessary redirect

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

tagging A land without people for a people without land

I put up a one phrase page A land without people for a people without land to redirect people to a page with an explanatory article on the standard version of the phrase A land without a people for a people without a land

This is a useful feature to help people find the phrase they are looking for.

Yes, but you also put up another page with exactly the same title, but in quotes: that was the one I proposed for deletion as an unnecessary redirect.

A small piece of advice: when you post on a talk page, it is polite to sign your edit by adding four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end, so that the recipient knows who the message has come from. The system converts them into a username and date and time, like this. JohnCD (talk) 18:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rex Lex

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rex Lex, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Rex Lex. —Travis ^talk 18:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Debora L. Spar

I have nominated Debora L. Spar, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debora L. Spar. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Niaz ^{(Talk •}^Contribs) 16:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Andrea Levin

A tag has been placed on Andrea Levin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 15:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Levin

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kenneth Levin, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/pfp.asp?ean=9781575254173&z=y. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at E. Michael Jones. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. NostinAdrek (talk) 23:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Please consider writing a balanced NPOV article.[reply]

I don't know the man. He is making headlines in the D.C. area this week - so I wrote up what i know about him. I assume/hope that others with greater familiarity with the far-right fringes of Catholic thought will add material. Isn't that whow Wikipedia works. You write what you know - othera add what they know, and it all adds up?

Joseph Massad

Thanks for your contributions, but please do not accuse others of vandalism without good cause; assume good faith. Changes made to the Joseph Massad article at the beginning of February were made as the result of discussions between several editors on the talk page including a request for comment from the biographies of living persons noticeboard. Kalkin (talk) 23:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Please read Wikipedia's policy concerning personal attacks. Your recent edit summaries and comments at Talk:Sara Roy are inappropriate and offensive, and continuing in this vein will lead to your being blocked. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Anita Renfroe

A tag has been placed on Anita Renfroe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 13:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pahe updated.

Judge a quick nudge to let you know there is a new message on Talk:Anita Renfroe. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 14:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Karen Arenson

I have nominated Karen Arenson, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Arenson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Relata refero (talk) 13:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anita Renfroe

I have nominated Anita Renfroe, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Renfroe. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Relata refero (talk) 13:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tova Mirvis

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tova Mirvis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Tova Mirvis. Relata refero (talk) 13:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radical History Review

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Radical History Review, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Radical History Review. Relata refero (talk) 13:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kenneth Levin

An editor has nominated Kenneth Levin, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Levin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regards

In case you think I'm on a crusade against every article you've created, believe me, I'm not. I've even got one undeleted for you.. Relata refero (talk) 22:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Keith (clergyman)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alexander Keith (clergyman), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Alexander Keith. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:26, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Pallywood

Thank you for your recent edits to Pallywood, but I'm afraid they constitute a kind of addition that Wikipedia's policies specifically prohibit. Please see my explanation at the end of Talk:Pallywood#More examples needed?. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Updated) I've moved my comments to the end of the talk page for your attention. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious - how did you discover this article in the first place? We seem to have had a lot of new editors on it in the last couple of weeks, and I was wondering if the article has been mentioned in the media. -- ChrisO (talk) 22:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Roy

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sara Roy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Relata refero (disp.) 19:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sara Roy

I have nominated Sara Roy, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Roy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 22:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Diana Muir

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Diana Muir, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Diana Muir seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Diana Muir, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]