User talk:Amazing Galaxy

May 2022

Hello, I'm HistoryofIran. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Muhammad of Ghor, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 16:49, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad of Ghor. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 03:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have already given enough references and changed his death date which is accurate. Nowadays Wikipedia is full of leftist community so stop being hyprocrate and say the truth istead of removing it. Amazing Galaxy (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Amazing Galaxy: You didn't add any WP:RS (as you claimed) apart from fabricated bardic tales and lots of WP:OR. This is a well established fact that Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad ibn Sam lived till 1206 and sucedded brother Ghiyath as sole ruler of entire Ghurid empire in 1202 following laters illness. His assassination is well documented in annals of that time and chronicles like Hasan Nizami. He lead Ghurids against Khwarazmians in Battle of Andhkhud 1204 (where he lost & Ghurid expansion in west halted)

Jaichand treachery along with Prithviraj killing Mu'izz are fabrication of Rajputs in later times to compensate for their defeats.
There is nothing leftiest bias here, even neutral scholars like Dashratha Sharma, Rima Hooja, R.V Somani, R.B Singh all dismissed this fable. Let alone them, hardcore politically motivated nationalist historian like Sita Ram Goel too dismissed this claim and mentioned Mu'izz assassination in 1206 by Ghakkars.
Please read history from scholarly works and not from movies or television series. Also, try to be more civil and edit collaboratively in future with reliable sources and not vague claims. Packer&Tracker (talk) 16:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Amazing Galaxy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Chola dynasty did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did in your recent edits. पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 12:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 20:55, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've blocked you because you're adding GDP numbers in historical articles without references and edit warring when you're reverted. Please get consensus for adding these numbers (you could, for example, post something on WT:IN). You're blocked for a week but, if you clearly state that you won't add any more GDP numbers but will seek consensus first, you can ask to be unblocked (use the unblock request template). If you sit out the block and then return to adding GDP numbers without consensus, you will be indefinitely blocked. --RegentsPark (comment) 20:59, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can I add consensus Amazing Galaxy (talk) 08:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:Consensus and make sure you - always - provide reliable sources.--RegentsPark (comment) 16:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I took a look at your contributions and almost all (perhaps, all) were reverted. If you don't figure things out quickly, you'll end up with an indefinite block. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. This editor is on my watchlist. Doug Weller talk 16:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]