User talk:Amaury/2022/July

2022 Archive Index: January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

Hunter Street (TV series)

"This was done for a reason." "There was a reason this wasn't done here." ...care to explain the reason? BrickMaster02 (talk) 22:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

It's on the talk page... Amaury • 22:24, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Lab Rats (American TV series)

This is another article in which you may want to reword the lede, as you've been doing at other articles, to avoid this comma insanity... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 07:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

@IJBall: They've done the same on other pages, but I'm wondering if this is Pwt898: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pwt898/Archive. Please examine their edit summaries and compare them to that account. If a genuine user starts getting involved (again), I may consider it, but I am done with idiots. On Zombies 3, the same idiot who fought for adding the pointless and trivial stylization of the DCOMs added the note list with the note stating how it's styled and clearly ignoring WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. The consensus at Zombies does not mean there is consensus to add it on Zombies 3. Or Zombies 2, for that matter, but I'm not going to continue with these idiots. If they want to ruin or regress these articles, they can have fun with that. I may be taking the Zombies articles off my watchlist. Amaury • 09:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Edit summary isn't quite close enough for it to be clear, IMO. Worth keeping an eye on... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:Lists of Disney television series characters

That's what I'm referring to, as this list mainly contains shows with Disney Branded Television. Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network's lists work similarly. Disney Junior is technically part, and there are as many DXD shows anyway. "Disney Channel" has a clear distinction. MegaSmike46 (talk) 23:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Common words

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Preadolescent and tween are not common words. I am replacing the instances of tween in articles because it is seldom recognized by non-American readers and is entirely a slang-derived term. Ditto for teen. Turboplate (talk) 09:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

@Turboplate: Stop changing wording that is coming directly from sources in most cases. I don't know if this comes under WP:NOTCENSORED or what, but you should not be doing what you are doing. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

@Turboplate: I'd like to second what IJBall said. Though most of your changes in your edit to Dylan and Cole Sprouse were at the least not bad (that is, they don't super change article quality in either direction), I had to perform a partial revert of your changing "preteen and teen" to "young female" as only one part of that sentence is supported by a source which mentioned gender (the other part appears to just be "tween" (wording used in source but not in Wikipedia article) broadly construed according to the source supporting it rather than girls specifically, so the change to "young female" feels inaccurate when applied to that aspect of the sentence). - Purplewowies (talk) 17:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Further, "teen" is a common word, that is commonly understood – that should not be replaced. I grant the "tween" is a bit of a Neologism, but it shouldn't be replaced if the source uses it... Otherwise, replacing a general term like "tween" with an exact age, which I saw Turboplate do somewhere is fine, as long as there's a source that supports the exact age. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

@IJBall: @Purplewowies: Wikipedia has to keep up with the times and use the language best-suited for modern readers. Tween may be common as a demographic neologism but it seldom recognized outside of marketing purposes. It's only a matter of time before it falls hard out of usage and becomes a dated term, much like what happened to bobby soxer (which was a common informal term to refer to a female adolescent in the 1940s and '50s, but is seldom used today outside of historical coverages related to decades-old youth pop culture and Frank Sinatra's impact on music, mostly used in quotations or italics and with past-tense verbs). By then we'll have to replace all instances of tween in articles with preadolescent, young, or early adolescent, and italicize or quotate the important mentions of the word to emphasize that it's an out-of-fashion neologism. Since it's a modern neologism, there's no doubt its mostly commonly understood meaning will dissipate within the next few decades and tween will be reduced to denoting the second syllable of between. In fact, the first usage of tween as a noun was around the 14th century and described a maid. The second usage was coined by J. R. R. Tolkien to identify a group of hobbits in the age range of their 20s. It finally became a marketing term for preteens and early teenagers around the late 1960s. It's not too out of field to assume the same fate could occur to preteen, teenager, and teen as well. For starters, the first one doesn't make it clear that a child is supposed to be 9-12 years old, as the -pre prefix meaning before denotes any chronological stage before the start of the one identified in the word following -pre. So by that logic even a 2-year-old technically qualifies as a preteen. Teenager and teen are more tricky. Teen is literally the only numeral in the Enlgish language used as a noun to describe people of the age range which the numeral represents (you don't hear anyone calling a 25-year-old a twenty or a 38-year-old a thirty), which is kind of bizarre, but not as bizarre as the word teenager itself. Teenager gives a very ambiguous approximation of the age range most affected by the developmental process of adolescence; there's no on-and-off-switch activated between one's 13th and 20th birthdays, and implies that a 12-year-old and a 13-year-old are significantly different just because the pronunciation of their ages differ in consistency; same for a 19-year-old and a 20-year-old. But moreover it lumps developmentally incompatible ages in the same category all because they follow the same numeral pattern. A 13-year-old is a child on the cusp of adolescence while a 19-year-old is a legal adult (by the way, categorizing 18- and 19-year-olds as teenagers further makes the line between an adult and a minor more blurred, especially when teenager is used as an antonym to adult in a sentence) who's most likely graduated high school and is in the later stages of adolescence, also having finished puberty. Even 13 compared to 17 is a massive difference in development despite both being minors. But also because teenager is the only commonly used noun in the English language to end with ager, which further proves how inconsistent it is with the age group categorization system. Most American and English-speaking cultures arbitrarily cite 13 as the end of childhood not only because it marks the entrance into a new numeral range, but also because of the generalization that puberty is most common at this age. This, of course, is up for debate, as puberty affects individuals at different rates and there is no set timetable. But furthermore most 13-year-olds are only very early into puberty, especially boys, while girls are typically at the start of transitioning biologically from girl to woman at 12. Lastly, if we determine the end of childhood based on school level, then 13 as the cutoff point is inaccurate because most 13-year-olds in America are still attending middle school and will not be in high school for another year or two. One last thing: another theory to support my predictions of teenager, teen, and teenage falling out of fashion are that all of them are defined purely by a numeric pattern and nothing else. They are not terms related to biological, physical, mental, social, or legal development, unlike child, adolescent, youth, or young adult. Turboplate (talk) 23:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

TL;DR – in short, this is one editor's opinion. Bottom line: Don't change wording from sourcing without a talk page discussion first. And the idea that "teen" or "teenager" is not a "common word" is pretty laughable. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:25, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Though, in the future hypothetical scenario where the word tween does fall hard out of fashion and becomes seldom used, would you agree with my idea of replacing all instances with preadolescent in articles and italicizing and quotating the important instances of the word to signify their old fashion? Turboplate (talk) 06:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't expect that to happen, especially with "teen/teenager". If there's consensus (later) to replace "tween", then that's the consensus, and there would likely be a consensus about a replacement word. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User Max263

User I've had issues with before is back after a break to rowspan vandalism in contravention of WP:FILMOGRAPHY, just now at Josh Hutcherson (also just edited Danger Force). Please keep an eye out on your end. Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:47, 21 July 2022 (UTC)