User talk:Amanda Paul

Notability of Paul Atherton

A tag has been placed on Paul Atherton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 20:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Ballet of Change: Piccadilly Circus

Per this, the film is notable. It doen't even matter that you found terrific sourcing and have made strong arguments toward notability. That "The film was selected for preservation in a national archive" says it all. Do not be disheartened. Add your sources. Have faith. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Silent voices

A tag has been placed on Silent voices requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Josh Parris 11:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Atherton - help with reinstatement

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

I've noticed that my entry for Paul Atherton has been deleted on notability grounds, 5 years after it was accepted.

The press coverage on Paul has increased over this time and links and notations were added to my contribution.

I've been forthcoming about knowing Paul in my previous posts and didn't believe that to be a reason not to contribute as the evidence to support his notability was substantial (accepted in the National Film Archive, First & Only Director to have film shown on a National Landmark, TV, Radio & press coverage etc.)

It appears that the editor User:Peterforever2 who suggested it's deletion doesn't exist and I would like some help in having the page reinstated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Atherton (2nd nomination)

Normally if a tag for deletion is applied to something I've generated it appears in my user talk. It doesn't appeared to have done so in this instance. So I wasn't able to defend my submission.

Many thanks

Amanda Paul

Hello. If you think that the article should not have been deleted, you can stop by WP:DRV and post it for review. Topher385 (talk) 22:53, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Amanda Paul. You have new messages at The Bushranger's talk page.
Message added 16:07, 8 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:07, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Our London Lives (2016 film) (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Our London Lives (2016 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Amanda Paul, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Amanda Paul. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The COI tag on this talk page was removed by a bot, based on the bot's belief that "Amanda Paul" has not edited for many years. Nevertheless, users with the same viewpoint, tone, and argumentation style repeatedly showed up during those years, probably typing their contributions with the same fingers that once used the sig Amanda Paul. So I would like to preserve that memory here on the talk page. HouseOfChange (talk) 21:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Our London Lives (2016 film) (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Our London Lives (2016 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Our London Lives (2016 film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Our London Lives (2016 film). Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Our London Lives has been accepted

Our London Lives, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Amanda Paul. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Atherton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Atherton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Atherton (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 04:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Ballet of Change: Piccadilly Circus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Ballet of Change: Piccadilly Circus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ballet of Change: Piccadilly Circus (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 14:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Our London Lives for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Our London Lives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our London Lives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Colour Blind (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colour Blind (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colour Blind (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 16:19, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Silent Voices (2005 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silent Voices (2005 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silent Voices (2005 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black & White Handshake - Still from the film Colour Blind (2009).JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Black & White Handshake - Still from the film Colour Blind (2009).JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. HouseOfChange (talk) 03:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black & White Handshake - Still from the film Colour Blind (2009).JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Black & White Handshake - Still from the film Colour Blind (2009).JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Cavanah in Golliwog Make-up - Colour Blind 2009.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Cavanah in Golliwog Make-up - Colour Blind 2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Silent Voices DVD Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Silent Voices DVD Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]