User talk:AmandaRR123/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:AmandaRR123. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:AmandaRR123/Fishermen's Wives of Gloucester has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fishermen's Wives of Gloucester, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 21:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
AmandaRR123, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi AmandaRR123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
LionMans Account (talk) 00:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Books & Bytes New Years Double Issue
Happy New Year, and welcome to a special double issue of Books & Bytes. We've included a retrospective on the changes and progress TWL has seen over the last year, the results of the survey TWL participants completed in December, some of our plans for the future, a second interview with a Wiki Love Libraries coordinator, and more. Here's to 2014 being a year of expansion and innovation for TWL!
The Wikipedia Library completed the first 6 months of its Individual Engagement grant last week. Here's where we are and what we've done:
- Increased access to sources: 1500 editors signed up for 3700 free accounts, individually worth over $500,000, with usage increases of 400-600%
- Deep networking: Built relationships with Credo, HighBeam, Questia, JSTOR, Cochrane, LexisNexis, EBSCO, New York Times, and OCLC
- New pilot projects: Started the Wikipedia Visiting Scholar project to empower university-affiliated Wikipedia researchers
- Developed community: Created portal connecting 250 newsletter recipients, 30 library members, 3 volunteer coordinators, and 2 part-time contractors
- Tech scoped: Spec'd out a reference tool for linking to full-text sources and established a basis for OAuth integration
- Broad outreach: Wrote a feature article for Library Journal's The Digital Shift; presenting at the American Library Association annual meeting
Welcome to WIKISOO
Hello and welcome to the Writing Wikipedia Articles course (#WIKISOO)! We look forward to meeting you in the first class on 25 February (Americas)/26 Feb (Asia/Australia). By now you should have received an introductory email with some details about the course. If you can't find it, there's an archived copy of the email at this link.
To attend the live session, please check our course home page for instructions and the link. We recommend logging into Blackboard Collaborate (the live class software we use) before the day of class, to be sure it's working. (More tips on the home page.)
If taking the course in self-paced mode, please come say hello on the course talk page so we know who you are! Thanks for signing up, and we'll see you Tuesday! - Pete (talk) 06:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 4
News for February from your Wikipedia Library.
Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers
Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement
American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia
Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th
Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Second WIKISOO class starts soon!
Hi! Just a quick reminder that the second WIKISOO class starts in about 3 hours. Even if you missed Week 1, please join us at this link for the live webinar - ideally about 15 minutes early to test your mic/speakers. If you haven’t finished up your Week 1 homework, there’s still time; post any questions on the class talk page! You can also watch a video of last week’s class on YouTube (earlier audio problems have been corrected). Feel free to contact me on my talk page with questions anytime! - WIKISOO co-instructor Sara FB (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Amanda!
I'd love to keep in touch and share tips and tricks for this whole Wikipedia Loves Libraries realm- we are a public library and this project is the wild wild West for us! Best, Kelsey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agathafrye (talk • contribs) 01:30, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
WIKISOO Week 3
Hi AmandaRR123, we look forward to seeing you in class in a few hours. We look forward to seeing you in class in a few hours. Here's the link to our Week 3 class page and to the live webinar.
PLEASE NOTE: If you're not in the USA, please double-check the class time. We have gone on Daylight Savings Time (also known as Summer Time) in the USA, so for some of you the class time will be an hour earlier. (If your country goes on Summer Time in the coming weeks, you will want to check again!)
This week we are going to start off with some basic review of all we've covered. So if you've been feeling behind or confused by all the details, we'll make sure we've got your questions answered before forging ahead! See you soon, -Pete (talk) 16:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Week 4 of Writing Wikipedia Articles: Final Projects Ahoy!
Hey AmandaRR123 - hope all is going well with you as we segue into Week 4 of WIKISOO! Just a reminder, in case you need it, that depending on your time zone, class time may have shifted - check out this link to make sure you know when to join us. Looking forward to chatting more with you this week about the Final Project - if you already know which article you're working on, you'll find instructions there for sharing this information easily with your classmates. Post any questions to the class Talk page, please! See you in class tomorrow! Sara FB (talk) 01:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
WIKISOO check-in
How's it going, AmandaRR123? Just touching base as we start the fifth (!) week of the WIKISOO course. We're excited to see students working on such a diverse range of articles! If you haven't already, log in, scroll down to the bottom of the main course page to list your chosen final project article next to your own name; brag a little about your work (or just ask questions!) on the course talk page; and join the live lecture tomorrow as we move towards completion of the course! This is when things get exciting. :) Looking forward to seeing you in class! - Sara FB (talk) 23:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Week 6 of WIKISOO
Hi AmandaRR123! Just checking in as we head into the final week of the Writing Wikipedia Articles class. You can look through last week's ether pad notes, check out your homework assignments from Week 5, and watch last week's lecture on YouTube - all right here. Check out my note from last week (above) if you're still diving into your Final Project... or head over to the course talk page to see if anyone else is having the same issues you are! Looking forward to seeing you in the last live webinar of the session tomorrow. Big WikiLove. -Sara FB (talk) 23:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Basic notability 101
Hi Amanda. I noticed you removed the PROD from Community Resources for Justice, which you are certainly entitled to do. However, I am going to nominate it for deletion, which you cannot remove. I see your point about the institute's work being important and agree to an extent. However, neither your opinion nor my opinion on the subject of the article's importance has any bearing on whether or not it gets an article on Wikipedia. What matters is notability.
Put simply, the definition of notability is (Jeopardy-style in the form of a question): "Are reliable, independent, secondary sources talking about the subject in detail?" In addition, for organizations and corporations (see WP:ORG), you must show sources that are either widely distributed (like books or national magazines) or sources from a disparate geographic area. (in this case, outside of Boston). I looked and did not find any. I hope you can, but that is what it is going to take to prevent the article for being deleted (and even if it is, it will not stop you from re-creating it at a later date when better sources are available). Good luck and happy editing! John from Idegon (talk) 23:08, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: thanks very much, I appreciate the additional information, and added my comments to the discussion page for the article's deletion. I think that was the right place to do so, but I may be wrong! I'd like to work on articles in the history area, so am interested in learning more about working within the notability guidelines. AmandaRR123 (talk) 18:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Your arguments there are possibly compelling enough to get me to withdraw the nomination. My concern is detail. The only one that I could review online was just a passing mention, more about the architecture of a building than a human rights organization. For a reference to be usable to show notability, it first must be reliable (see WP:RS for details, but in short, must have some fact checking policy in place. Newspapers, magazines of general circulation [not trade publications], books [as long as they are published by mainline publishers and not vanity press], respected academic journals, TV and radio news and their websites are all reliable sources. Web content, other than the sites of reliable print sources, are generally not.) and it also must be "in detail". That means, in the case of magazines and newspapers, that it has to be an article that is substantially about the organization rather than a directory-type listing or a brief mention in an article on another subject. It also means that the article cannot be based primarily on an interview with a person connected with the organization or on a press release.
- If you can show me thru a weblink or a quote that some of the sources I could not see satisfy that requirement, I will gladly withdraw my nomination. Happy editing. It is good to see new editors that are willing to work within our structure rather than fighting it! Thanks! Since you are a librarian, I thought I'd better proofread this closely. {{smile}} John from Idegon (talk) 18:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: thanks -- I appreciate all the help! I tried to add a few more sources and re-write the article to make clearer the scope of the orgs work, and added additional comments to the deletion talk page.
April 2014
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:2014 Boston Marathon, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Safiel (talk) 16:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 5
The Wikipedia Library
- New Visiting Scholar positions
- TWL Branch on Arabic Wikipedia, microgrants program
- Australian articles get a link to librarians
- Spotlight: "7 Reasons Librarians Should Edit Wikipedia"
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Feedback on a new beta feature called Hovercards
Hi AmandaRR123, We are collecting feedback for a new beta feature called 'Hovercards' - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Beta_Features/Hovercards. Beta features can be turned on using the tab in the top right. It would be great if you could turn the feature on and give us your feedback on the discussion page. Thanks Vibhabamba (talk) 10:18, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
This Month in Education: May 2014
| |||||
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elma Lewis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- for the school, local arts groups, and classical orchestras, a chorus, a dance troupe and s"]. The History Makers: The Nation's Largest African American Video Oral History Collection. Web.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zipporah Potter Atkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Museum of African American History (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 6
The Wikipedia Library
- New donations from Oxford University Press and Royal Society (UK)
- TWL does Vegas: American Library Association Annual plans
- TWL welcomes a new coordinator, resources for library students and interns
- New portal on Meta, resources for starting TWL branches, donor call blitzes, Wikipedia Visiting Scholar news, and more
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
This Month in Education: June 2014
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: New Account Coordinators Needed
Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.
It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitz
gmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:AmandaRR123. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |