User talk:Alun009

Manchester

Please see the Manchester Talk Page for an update on the image removal.

R_Orange 17:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome

Hello, it seems you've been with us for some time yet nobody has welcomed you, which I'm really sorry about. Allow me to post the standard Wiki welcome template, which you may (or may not) find of use...

Welcome!

Hello, Alun009, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

...it seems you've done some good work so far, and are keen on improving articles about Manchester. You may wish to join the Greater Manchester WikiProject which is a page dedicated to the improvement and promotion of Greater Manchester related articles, and a space to discuss ideas (we need quality members all the time!).

I think you've got the right approach to the main Manchester photograph and will try to support you all the way. Any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page. Jza84 23:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem to welcome you at all! In addition to your work for the photograph, you may also wish to pass comment in this section of the Manchester talk page. Jza84 12:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments - I really appreciated your input. I'm still having problems with the user in question, and thus have asked for a fifth opinion on this! Once consensus is established and it is possible to demonstrate this contributor, I'll seek advise from an administrator. Jza84 20:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i'm a bit confused

Thanks for creating my user page I think?!?!?! I think you might need to ask the user first before you do it, because some might get a bit angry.

Sorry If I sounded angry before, I was just in a bit of a bad mood. Like the work you are doing (this is Wjs13's IP, sometimes I don't log in

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ESR screen shot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ESR screen shot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fog Lane Park

There's a small discussion about the Fog Lane Park article at WT:GM. Your input would be welcomed. Mr Stephen (talk) 22:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fog Lane Park

I have nominated Fog Lane Park, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog Lane Park. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 17:19, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saboteur 2. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant ^talk 23:47, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Alun009. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
Message added 16:35, 6 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Saboteur 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Alpha Quadrant ^talk 18:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Verdens Lykkeligste Mand, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Danish and Chorus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Milk bottle top for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milk bottle top is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milk bottle top until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ibadibam (talk) 19:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Saboteur 2 card game.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saboteur 2 card game.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]