User talk:Alumnum/2009

Welcome!

Hello, Alumnum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 17:17, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BRIC

Where did you get the figure that Brazil's GDP in 2050 would be over 16 billion? According the paper by Mr. O'neil and his team at Golden it will be about 11 billion. Anyways thanks for contributing to the article, but only use sourced accurate info. Jesusmariajalisco (talk) 02:30, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yanks

Hello Eduardo, I see you keep inserting "yankee" or some derivative of it as a demonym in the United States article. Please stop doing so without discussing this at the talk page. If you keep reverting and re-reverting you are going to be in violation of the three revert rule and you will probably be blocked, which would be a shame. Take care, TastyCakes (talk) 14:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Potential superpowers

Please, stop adding Brazil to the list of potential superpowers without any sources to support the claim. If you however happen to find a reasonable amount of reliable sources calling Brazil a potential or emerging superpower, tell us in the discussion page, and we'll add it, but just because you happen to come from Brazil doesn't make it a superpower. Swedish pirate (talk) 09:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep adding Brazil to the potential superpowers-page, without discussing the addition on the discussion-page and/or providing a number of reliable sources supporting Brazil as an emerging superpower, I'll have to issue a block-request to the admins of Wikipedia. Swedish pirate (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say what Swedish Pirate has basically, refrain from quite simply biased and ridiculous editing, this is Wikipedia not Brazil Today.G. R. Allison (talk) 06:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Brazil

About adding Brazil; the process is quite simple. If you want to add Brazil you would have to find a reasonable number of reliable sources (that is books or articles written by academics, politicians, professional authors or some other kind of experts - preferably NOT news-articles ), let us examine them in the discussion page and if the consensus is that it should be included then we'll add it. Swedish pirate (talk) 19:06, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Golbez (talk) 03:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since you insisted. --Golbez (talk) 05:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. the recent edit you made to the page List of iCarly episodes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Fetchfan88 (talk) 22:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

iCarly

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of iCarly episodes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Ophois (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I was just wondering if I could stop edit warring on the List of iCarly episodes article, as this may lead to you being blocked by an administrator. Please try to settle any disagreements with other editors on the talk page. Thank you! Master of Puppets - _{Call me MoP! :D} 20:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Bandeirantes Anthem, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of cities by GDP

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of cities by GDP. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities by GDP. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]