User talk:Altamimi579

Welcome!

Hello, Altamimi579, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Al-Awamiyah does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! <RetroCraft314 talk/> 16:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Al-Awamiyah, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 06:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Al-Awamiyah. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 06:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Awamiyah

They are editing and posting biased material and being bias against the Saudi government. This will not be tolerated. Altamimi579 (talk) 20:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Al-Awamiyah seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia goes by what wp:reliable sources state. That information that you have repeatedly removed on Al-Awamiyah is supported by Reuters, The Independent, and others. Regarding "biased", please see wp:Neutral point of view, WP:BIASED. Please discuss your concerns on talk:Al-Awamiyah and get wp:concensus before restoring. Jim1138 (talk) 20:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi Altamimi579, i'm Wikaviani, i reverted two of your recent edits here : [1] and here : [2] because no explanations were provided by you for your changes. More, you have to support your edits with reliable sources. If you need any help, i'll be glad to help you as much as i can. Thanks.---Wikaviani (talk) 20:53, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Al-Awamiyah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I reverted another of your edits for the same reason. Please, avoid edit warring, take your concerns to the talk pages of the articles you want to edit and gain consensus before editing. You're currently engaged in an edit war, this will not be tolerated. Thanks. Wikaviani (talk) 21:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Wikaviani (talk) 17:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Altamimi579_reported_by_User:wikaviani_(Result:_) and comment on why you should not be blocked. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Al-Awamiyah. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring

Unless you supply a source that states "Howtat", do not change.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hotat Bani Tamim. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 23:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Hotat Bani Tamim. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 03:41, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Jim1138 (talk) 07:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring, as you did at Hotat Bani Tamim. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you created a talk page discussion soon before this block was applied. If you create an unblock request and agree and promise not to edit the article further until the discussion reaches a consensus or successful close, I'll unblock you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Yemeni Civil War , Updated June 24.png

Thanks for uploading File:Yemeni Civil War , Updated June 24.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Yemeni Civil War , Updated June 24.png

The file File:Yemeni Civil War , Updated June 24.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Please use the .SVG version. If you don't know how to update the .SVG version please ask for help at Commons. Don't create new versions like this that are bound to be useless very quickly.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Majora (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]