User talk:Alootikki96
Welcome
[edit]Hello Alootikki96 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Matt Smith, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! KyleJoantalk 16:38, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- KyleJoan Hello. I'd to give reasons as to why I removed links on Matt Smith's page
1. https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/95abfcf2-017c-39d7-8ffe-cf2413fc4650 (The article is clearly an announcement article, is an opinionated blog, and is also published without an author name; both of which are valid reasons for link removal) 2. https://web.archive.org/web/20131014145026/http://www.nsb.northants.sch.uk/?_id=1631 (The article is published without an author name and also the platform does not seem credible to be used as a reference. )
August 2021
[edit]
Hello Alootikki96. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alootikki96. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alootikki96|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Kuru (talk) 11:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2021 (UTC)