User talk:Aloevariation
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Aloevariation! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Cherrell410 (talk) 20:00, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit]
Hi Aloevariation! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Cœ (talk) 20:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cœ (talk) 20:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Aloevariation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:50, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Aloevariation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm writing this here because i am TIRED of all the harasment you have been doing to be over the last month. I am very intersted in languages and have been for YEARS and i even made some myself. i was trying to make some CONSTRUCTIVE edits on wikipedia because when i was looking at some languages that are "isolates" i found out that many of them wer enot and that YOU are making all of this stuff up! i dont know why you are doing this and how youve been able to GET AWAY WITH THIS FOR SO LONG! you and your cabal of sockpuppets and manpulation of admins have been making hoaxes on wikipedia for YEARS. I was trying to fix those stupid articles on nestofbirdnests and then you started reverting my PERFECTLY FINE EDITS! THOSE EDITS WERE CONSTRUCTIVE AND CORRECT!AND THEN YOU GOT MY ACCOUNT PERM BLOCKED! i made another account so that I could talk to you RATIONALY but then IT GOT BLOCKED AGAIN! I AM SO FRUSTERATED WITH THESE ADMISN ON WIKIPEDIA! YOU KEEP REVERTING EVERY EDIT I MAKE FOR STUPID REASONS! I want you to stop. Just stop. then you got my IP BLOCKED!! FOR WHAT??! BECAUSE I WAS MAKING GOOD EDITS TO THE ENCYCLOPEDIA? BUT THATS APAPRENTLY NOT ALLOWED! so then I went on simple eng wiki because I wanted to stay away from you harasing me. but then you GOT MY ACCOUNTS BLOCKED THERE TOO! and not only that YOU GOT MY BOYFRIED BLOCKED FOR NO REASON! WHY? Is it because you know that IM A FURRY and you HATE THEM? what is with people and there hate of them. you and other people always think that we aall sexualy attracted to animals! i have a cat and NOT ONCE in my life have i ever or have i ever thought of doing somethih glike that to him! the fact that u and your little admin friends have gotten my accounst BLOCKED just because I am a furry. so now my ip address is BLOCKED UNTIL OCTOBER!!! and from what i see you will wont stop at anything, you'll get my ip adress then make a report to my school cause im using their ips to make my edits too and then youll get verizon involved so you can ccome up with a STUPID EXCUSE to get my internet acess blocked! why do you hate furries? why to you want to get me banned from wiki? just stop harassing me! I love languages and i want to make this wikipedia really good. but you keep tagging my accounts like User:Stoatery as sockpuppets! I AM SO MAD WITH YOU AND THIS WIKI RIGHT NOW! THESE ADMINS ARE SO UNFAIR, AND THEYLL ALWAYS SIDE WITH YOU ISNEAD OF ME! when i become an admin one dday, the first thing i will do is GLOBALLY BAN YOU AND ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS! just let me edit for once! stop harassing me or ill bring this up to the arbitration comittee! Aloevariation (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Additionally, your talk page access has been revoked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.