User talk:Almgerdeu

Speedy deletion nomination of Ernest Proud

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ernest Proud requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Northern Escapee (talk) 19:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Almgerdeu

A tag has been placed on User:Almgerdeu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (there written that user dont edit out of userpage...itisnot true about me absolutely...because i created many pages and edited it...and there written that wiki isnot free web host etc. I created them (my user page writings) for use them in different pages so it is not true reason fordeletion) --Almgerdeu (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Your user page is for information about you and your editing. You can use User:Almgerdeu/sandbox as a place to store information you are using etc. PamD 07:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

yes you are right...i changed it...a Almgerdeu (talk) 10:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Youssouf Muhammad

Hello Almgerdeu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Youssouf Muhammad for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 20:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

I understood what do John B123 (talk) say and I changed it. Almgerdeu (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Copyright

I can see that you are a new editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Youssouf Muhammad. Thank you for rewriting the infringing text. Almost everything on the web is subject to copyright, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. I thought it was an interesting article. Good work! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ernest Proud for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ernest Proud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Proud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 12:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

I did not know it, I will not use it as source. Thanks Sir Sputnik talk--------Almgerdeu (talk) 21:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Retired

You don't put "retired referee" in articles about deceased people. Such a person "was a referee". Geschichte (talk) 06:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

ok, thanks Geschichte (talk) Almgerdeu (talk) 07:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

For the same reason, you don't write "former" either... Geschichte (talk) 20:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

ok i understood...i will noy use it....Geschichte (talk) Almgerdeu (talk) 20:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Learning

I see quite a few of your article creations while stub-sorting.

Please remember:

1. If we know both birth and death dates we write "(1878-1914)" in the lead sentence, without "born" or "died"
2. Section headings like "External links" use a capital letter at the start but not for other words (ie not "Links")

I've corrected both points in Hubert Istace. Please also remember to give details in all your references so we can see where you got the information without having to follow the link, and give "access date" for all online references. Thanks,  PamD 13:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

ok thanks for comebacks PamD Almgerdeu (talk) 13:46, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

But if we only know the birth or the death date then we say "(born 1952)" or "(died 1952). I've corrected your newly-created Franz Mayer (referee). Now please go back to that article and improve the references: those you have added are not good enough because they do not show the sources you have consulted. Please stop creating new articles until you have improved this one. PamD 07:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

i understood born or died information and will use as you said. But i dont agree wit you about reference talking. why are they not good, i did not understood?? PamD Almgerdeu (talk) 08:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Have a look at WP:CITEWEB. The reader should be able to look at the reference listed under "References" and see just where you found the information, without having to click to follow any link, and also when you consulted it, if it was a website, because they often change over time. They can then assess whether the source looks reliable, whether it is something they want to follow up, etc. Your habit of just giving a simple title is not helpful. PamD 13:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Hugh Phillips (referee), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please stop adding inadequate references. Read the advice you have been given and stop wasting other editors' time by leaving them to clean up after you. Thanks. PamD 16:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Navigation

When you create an article like Kjell Johansson (referee) with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Kjell Johansson), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 16:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

ok, thanks more more more...PamD Almgerdeu (talk) 18:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jacques Hirrle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacques Hirrle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Hirrle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

I did not understand what is your reason for put it for deletion page. He was officiated 4 international matches. What do you want another this?? Is this information enough for notable for BIO pages??? Fram (talk) Almgerdeu (talk) 14:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

WP:BIO: there don't seem to be any good sources about him, only listings in databases, match reports, ... Being an international referee is in itself not sufficient: if these didn't receive significant attention, then they should't have articles. Fram (talk) 15:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

but in wikipedia there are many many many articles as you said...please remove deletion tag...Fram (talk)

October 2020

Hello, Almgerdeu, I recently made copy edits to Gino Rigato by removing most of the inline references, because they linked to "Franz Mayer", not "Gino Rigato". Please find reliable sources that are specific to the subject of the article. As noted by PamD, you need to stop adding inadequate references to the articles you create. Thanks. Woodlot (talk) 19:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

thanks a lot...you are right...i corrected it...i will be more attentive...Woodlot (talk)

Proposed deletion of Ernst Albihn

The article Ernst Albihn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; a Google search revealed nothing more than entries in 'database' websites; no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 21:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

what do you think about for example this articles → Ruddy Buquet, Benoît Bastien, Bobby Madden or Andris Treimanis ???? dear Spiderone, there are a lot articles in wikipedia as we talk about.... What do you want from my created articles??? please, please.... Spiderone Almgerdeu (talk) 22:31, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

they all have some coverage but probably not enough to pass WP:GNG; I'd need to have a good look Spiderone 22:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

what are you say, please....all of them that i show you as for example are COMPLETELY similar with articles which YOU put to them template for deletion....What would you think if you were in my shoes??? Spiderone Almgerdeu (talk) 22:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

If you think any of the PRODs I've placed are incorrect then please remove the PROD and provide evidence of notability Spiderone 22:52, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

i cannot remove them, right?? another user can do it....please remove them... still not convinced??? Spiderone Almgerdeu (talk) 23:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

You are allowed to remove them but it is expected that you provide a valid reason if you do so. Spiderone 23:11, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emil Kroner

The article Emil Kroner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; a Google search revealed nothing more than entries in 'database' websites; no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 21:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bertil Ahlfors

The article Bertil Ahlfors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; a Google search revealed nothing more than entries in 'database' websites; no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources; does not appear to have ever been a notable referee

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 21:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Schumacher

The article James Schumacher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; a Google search revealed nothing more than entries in 'database' websites; no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 21:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ján Bízik

The article Ján Bízik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; a Google search revealed nothing more than entries in 'database' websites; no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources at all, this indicates that he probably wasn't that notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 21:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Franjo Bažant

The article Franjo Bažant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; a Google search revealed nothing more than entries in 'database' websites; no WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 21:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Bertil Ahlfors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bertil Ahlfors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertil Ahlfors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 09:39, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ján Bízik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ján Bízik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ján Bízik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 09:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of James Schumacher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Schumacher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Schumacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 11:52, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jacques Hirrle. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft space

Hi there, I hope you are well. I've noticed you've created a few more BLP stubs which lack sources that demonstrate WP:GNG. Might I suggest that you create some of these articles as a WP:DRAFT first and then publish to the mainspace after gathering enough sources to pass GNG? Kind regards Spiderone 16:38, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Please note that football referees are not inherently notable and therefore need to meet WP:GNG, which says that "if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list". The topics you have been creating articles about do not appear to be notable as they do not appear to meet GNG, and will likely be deleted. As such, I ask that you please stop creating non-notable articles. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 13:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

@GiantSnowman: - i dont understand that, why why why my articles (created by me)??? in wikipedia there are moreeeeeee articles about referees is technically absolutely same with articles you said...i dont know why you are doing as other users...is not???

Please listen to my advice and change your behaviour. We are here to help if we can. GiantSnowman 16:34, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

You are also invited to the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Not sure if this is the best place for it but need advice. GiantSnowman 16:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Freddy Burgos

The article Freddy Burgos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A WP:BEFORE search yields [1] [2] [3] but no WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 17:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

@Spiderone: hi again..i did not understand...you put here 3 sources...are them for this article?? which if I use them deletion tag can be removed..did i understand correctly??? Almgerdeu (talk) 18:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

When I searched Google, those were the best sources I could find but he is still only mentioned once in them. The coverage is not significant. I'm afraid he would need to have more sources than that to justify having a Wikipedia article. Spiderone 19:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

thanks a lot..Spiderone Almgerdeu (talk) 19:34, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aryeh Frost

The article Aryeh Frost has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence that this referee has ever received the coverage required for WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 11:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Franjo Bažant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franjo Bažant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franjo Bažant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 12:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: - Hi, i want to ask that are articles about referees who officiated World Cup or European Cup (any continental main tournament) matches natable??? if your answer is YES, why for football players are notable with playing at least a international match??? Other question, in wikipedia there are more articles about referees that have only database references but my some articles proposed deletion for this (only database references)...huge thanks...Almgerdeu (talk) 17:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Emil Kroner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emil Kroner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Kroner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 11:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Questions

@Spiderone: - Hi, can you say, for example any referee was awarded referee of year in his country or another award and it was noted in any newspaper or other source (website, not database website), is this pass notability for him? thanskAlmgerdeu (talk) 14:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

@Almgerdeu: probably notable in most cases. I would be more interested in how in-depth the coverage in the newspaper or news website is. If it's just a brief mention over one or two sentences then I would say it's not enough. If it's a whole article and, ideally, more than just one news source covering it, then there's more of a positive argument for notability there. Spiderone 15:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

@Spiderone: - ok thnksAlmgerdeu (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Title

When inserting the |title= in citation templates, you are supposed to write the actual title of the article. Geschichte (talk) 20:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of László Bálint (referee) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article László Bálint (referee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/László Bálint (referee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 09:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hubert Istace

The article Hubert Istace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a biographical article on a subject that does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 08:25, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

@Spiderone: İ think your job isto put PROD to my articles...please stop it, search for you another job please...Almgerdeu (talk) 08:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

If there are reliable sources out there covering Istace then please add them to the article and remove the PROD Spiderone 09:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raymond Vincenti

The article Raymond Vincenti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

an article on a referee with no assertion or evidence of being able to meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 08:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alistair McKenzie

The article Alistair McKenzie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

an article on a referee with no assertion or evidence of being able to meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 08:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ernst Albihn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ernst Albihn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernst Albihn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrzej Rutkowski

The article Andrzej Rutkowski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a biographical article on a referee with no evidence or even an assertion of notability; does not pass WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 09:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sultan Mjalli Khamis

The article Sultan Mjalli Khamis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a biographical article with no assertion or evidence of notability; fails WP:GNG and any other applicable guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 20:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Augusto Robles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Augusto Robles, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusto Robles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Almgerdeu! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, HELP ME !!!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Raymond Vincenti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raymond Vincenti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Vincenti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 20:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Naser Al-Ghafary

The article Naser Al-Ghafary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not appear to meet any inclusion criteria; a biographical article with no assertion or evidence of WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 14:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jozef Mohler

The article Jozef Mohler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not appear to meet any inclusion criteria; a biographical article with no assertion or evidence of WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 14:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arthur Björklund

The article Arthur Björklund has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not appear to meet any inclusion criteria; a biographical article with no assertion or evidence of WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 14:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mika Popović

The article Mika Popović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not appear to meet any inclusion criteria; a biographical article with no assertion or evidence of WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 14:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Alfred Micallef for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alfred Micallef, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Micallef until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Theo van Zwieteren

The article Theo van Zwieteren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article on a referee that fails WP:BASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 21:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 FIS Ski Jumping World Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuki Ito. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arto Ravander

The article Arto Ravander has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BASIC; no coverage outside database websites. Some articles do come up in a search relating to ice surfing but this is obviously a namesake.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 15:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2020–21 FIS Nordic Combined World Cup

Hello, Almgerdeu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2020–21 FIS Nordic Combined World Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2021 FIL World Luge Championships

Hello, Almgerdeu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 FIL World Luge Championships".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas Kyle (referee) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Kyle (referee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kyle (referee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 19:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2020–21 Skeleton World Cup

Hello, Almgerdeu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2020–21 Skeleton World Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Franz Mayer (referee)

The article Franz Mayer (referee) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BASIC; "Franz Mayer" + schiedsrichter isn't coming up with enough to justify the article. Listings in exhaustive referee databases do not confer notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 12:57, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 FIS Freestyle Ski World Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viktor Andersson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Werner Müller (referee) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Werner Müller (referee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Müller (referee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bruno Pfützner

The article Bruno Pfützner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC; no substantial coverage found in a search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas Vejlgaard

The article Thomas Vejlgaard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage found in searches nor in the three versions of this article in other languages; looks like a WP:GNG fail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Johannes Martens (referee)

The article Johannes Martens (referee) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of passing WP:GNG and nothing found in a search that was more than a trivial mention.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gunnar Michaelsen

The article Gunnar Michaelsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; only very trivial coverage found on him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Curt Liedberg

The article Curt Liedberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks the coverage from multiple sources required to pass WP:BASIC; not every referee is inherently notable just for officiating a small number of international matches.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Josef Gulde

The article Josef Gulde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:BASIC presented in the article nor in a search. Being the president of a regional FA doesn't make him notable either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Victor José Esquinas Torres

The article Victor José Esquinas Torres has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A BLP on a referee that does not meet WP:BASIC; nothing found in a search nor within the article suggests notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paul Neumann (referee)

The article Paul Neumann (referee) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:BASIC; no coverage found in a search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jef van Vliet

The article Jef van Vliet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting WP:BASIC found in a search. Nothing in the article suggests notability and he also doesn't meet WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Otto Remke

The article Otto Remke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks detailed coverage in reliable sources, failing WP:GNG; it's worth noting that name checks in match reports and profile pages on football database websites do not confer notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2020–21 FIS Freestyle Ski World Cup

Hello, Almgerdeu. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2020–21 FIS Freestyle Ski World Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Léon Schellings

The article Léon Schellings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks the coverage in multiple sources required to pass WP:GNG; all that can be found is this article, which is Schellings giving his opinion on a footballing incident. The article is not actually about Schellings himself. Even his World Referee page admits that we know next to nothing about him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norbert Rolles

The article Norbert Rolles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and no indication of notability. It has long since been established that referees do not automatically pass notability guidelines just by the fact that they have officiated a few international matches. Searches across a variety of search engines turn up little to no coverage and coverage that is found is trivial in nature.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Boggi

The article Robert Boggi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject is not notable. Lacks significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kstern (talk) 15:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Discussion which may be of interest

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#User:Almgerdeu_review and answer there; some editors have raised a few concerns. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zygmunt Ziober

The article Zygmunt Ziober has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; no assertion or evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gyula Emsberger

The article Gyula Emsberger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only routine announcements about his death found; lacks the depth required for WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stefan Meßner

The article Stefan Meßner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm aware that he did officiate a game where he gave out a lot of yellow cards but, aside from that, there is very little coverage. Does not meet WP:BASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of René Rogalla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article René Rogalla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/René Rogalla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert Sawtell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Sawtell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Sawtell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Schaut

The article Robert Schaut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; he has a few name checks in reliable sources but no evidence of significant coverage addressing him directly and in depth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2020–21 FIS Freestyle Ski World Cup

Hello, Almgerdeu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2020–21 FIS Freestyle Ski World Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Schami1989 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Schami1989. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

İ have a question Sir Sputnik, when my first account (Schami1989) blocked (reason was other than sockpuppet) and how many times have I written that I will not do the same mistakes ... but my account was not unblocked ... then I opened another account called Ekspertiza, but I did not know that there was a rule that the second account could not be opened .... than it was blocked also .... what should i have did ??? But i love to edit and creat pages about German football and winter sports...I am telling again ... I did not make the same mistake that caused the block of the Schami account again and when I opened the Ekspertiza account, I did not know that there was a rule because a second account could not be opened in wikipedia ....please please....I want you to answer as a human, not an administrator....

First and foremost, if you want to have a chance at being unblocked, you will need to be honest about your mistakes. Your explanation here does not line up with the timeline of events in 2019. Even if you didn't know the rules concerning use of multiple accounts then, you certainly knew them before registering this account, but did so anyway. The fact that you believe to have not repeated your mistakes is reason alone to not unblock you. Finally, please do not ask other editors to edit on you behalf while blocked. This is also block evasion, and will result in your access to this page being revoked if you do it again. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:14, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok i understood Sir Sputnik...please say me what can I do or what should I do for unblocking? İ wrote that I already knew I should not open Almgerdeu, but Schami or Ekspertiza accounts did not unbloked, no matter how hard I tried, accounts didn't open....now, say me what should I do?Almgerdeu (talk) 07:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Please

Helllo S.A. Julio...you have recreate some articles of User:Schami1989 that were blocked a few times ago ... thanks for these ... I am also a German football fan .... some of articles created by me have been deleted which have no problems (deletion reason is my account is sockpuppet) ... can you create some of them too? Finally, it's about German football and I know you are a fan of German football too... i can send you texts of articles which i desire?

Nomination of Adolf Miesz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adolf Miesz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Miesz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)