User talk:Alma Fordy

Welcome

Hello, Alma Fordy, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Alma Fordy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Alma Fordy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Confusing links to unrelated articles

I noticed that you're adding a lot of piped links. I don't understand why you're adding some of them. This is a manual of style issue; please see WP:EGG, which tells us not to redirect readers to unrelated Wikipedia articles. If a topic does not appear in the target article, please don't add a link to it. Not everything on Wikipedia needs to be linked. This is commonly known as overlinking. Please discuss your changes on an article's talk page if someone asks you why you made them. For example, it's very confusing to me why you've linked Pariah to Gavin Polone in this edit. "Pariah" is not mentioned once in Polone's Wikipedia article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Film distribution

Hi. Please see WP:FILMDIST. Please note that we only add the distribution companies for the country that produced the film. IE, a French film would not have its American distribution noted here. Any questions, please raise them here. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 14:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you chose to ignore this. If you carry on, then your edits will be considered disruptive and you'll be blocked from editing. Please reply here to state you understand. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 19:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at The Hundred-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out of the Window and Disappeared (film).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 19:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from La Petite Reine. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. hi you removed the maintenance tag Rough translation the problem has not been resolved the English is still very poor and has nothing to do with the original article in French. I can help you with the translation but I prefer to wait until you have finished editing. Domdeparis (talk) 16:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to La Petite Reine, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Domdeparis (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Trumbo (2015 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Uncredited works do not belong in a credited section. You are bordering on mass Wikipedia:Edit warring. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 17:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Alma_Fordy reported by User:Chrissymad (Result: ). Thank you. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 17:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dec 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Trumbo (2015 film). MarnetteD|Talk

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alma Fordy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have continued to use at least one more sockpuppet in an attempt to evade this block, added to the fact that your editing has been substantially disruptive apart from the sockpuppetry, the block has now been made indefinite. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alma Fordy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User AlmaFordy will be unblocked and then deleted immediately to avoid vandalism. No other user will never add any distribution of other countries to films of a foreign country. I will keep them as they are. JamesBWatson, please unblock Alma Fordy so that I can delete this user to avoid vandalism, today. Please! I promise I will never do it again.

Decline reason:

No way to delete accounts, therefore no reason to unblock this account. Yamla (talk) 14:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alma Fordy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Alma Fordy will stop adding distribution of America to foreign countries. This user will also avoid adding unneeded information to any other articles. Please unblock Alma Fordy today, please!

Decline reason:

Unblock request does not address the abuse of multiple accounts, which is the original block reason. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alma Fordy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now that I understand the information from WP:SOCK, WP:N, WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:GAB. I would only provide specific links for my user HayleyLike on HayleyLike's talk page as well as an explanation of the purpose of using User HayleyLike. There I would just create and edit and add citations to reliable sources. No sock puppetry will happen for User: HayleyLike because it is not a sock puppet of Fordy.

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 13:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alma Fordy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Alma Fordy is sorry for all the sockpuppetry it committed. It will never happen again. Alma Fordy will add sourced materials if needed. Alma Fordy will do what Lugnuts told it to do. It won't add any film distribution any more. It will follow the rules and regulations. The other sockpuppets of Fordy are also sorry for what they did. Alma will also stop linking production companies to famous celebrities just like what Chrissymad said. It is such a duck to add them. Alma will never abuse anymore accounts and will follow the rules as always. Please unblock me. I need to get back to contributing the right way, not the wrong way. Alma Fordy (talk) 01:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Considering the extent of the socking (which has been going on since December 2016 and is very disruptive), I think the WP:Standard Offer is the best you will get. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Entertainment 360

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Entertainment 360 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 03:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]