User talk:AllianceWriter

This is AllianceWriter's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Strobel (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject is almost certainly notable but too many of the claims in this draft are unsourced or lack in-line citations for it to enter the mainspace. I encourage the draft creator to cut back the article to only the claims immediately referenced to the most reliable sources (that means dropping the YouTube video and "ChannelKindness"). Once that's done, please resubmit!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Strobel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 21:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AllianceWriter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 21:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Strobel (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Strobel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Strobel (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi Grace - as the other reviewer stated I do think this could be an article eventually, but a few bits of the content remains unsourced. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability and WP:CITE which explains why and how to cite all the claims in this draft. Every single statement needs to have a reliable, independent, citation after it - or the statement should be removed. An editor has helpfully added some citation needed tags, these are the paragraphs you should either cite appropriate or delete. Once that has been done please do resubmit, but please don't resubmit if you still leave these claims uncited. Feel free to ask on the WP:Teahouse or my User Talk page if you have any questions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Strobel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Grace Strobel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Grace Strobel. Thanks! Cl3phact0 (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Strobel has been accepted

Grace Strobel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pbritti (talk) 17:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, AllianceWriter. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Grace Strobel, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please follow these links and read the relevant policies and guidelines, and then declare your COI. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your enlightenment! I am [obviously] new to Wiki page creation and appreciate your support. Can you help me find the URL where Grace's photo resides? It was deleted, and we are trying to submit the location as part of the copyright form. AllianceWriter (talk) 14:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please add your COI declaration per above (noted that you mentioned your COI in an edit summary, however, the guidelines give detailed instructions of what else you need to do to be 100% compliant with Wikipedia policy).

Also, it would be preferable to request edits/additions here on the talk page rather than editing the article yourself. Otherwise, there is a risk that the article will attract the eye of editors who may have a stricter interpretation of the WP:COI guidelines. This could lead to it being marked with a Template:Paid contributions or Template:COI tag at the top, or even nominated for deletion.

-- Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]