User talk:Alissa.lauren

Welcome!

Hello, Alissa.lauren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 21:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Jam Cruise, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

If you would like to continue working on the subject, go to Draft:Jam Cruise and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 21:37, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 21:37, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jam Cruise (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jam Cruise and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 02:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — kikichugirl ^oh hello! 02:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jam Cruise (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jam Cruise and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jam Cruise has been accepted

Jam Cruise, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cloud 9 Adventures

Hello Alissa.lauren,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cloud 9 Adventures for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rob van vee 18:25, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Holy Ship!. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:23, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not adding promotional material. I am adding additional information. Stop deleting and let me finish typing. Rude.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Holy Ship!, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 17:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being "disruptive" - you are being disruptive by continually reverting to an old, out-dated version of this article. I am currently editing to remove promotional-sounding material added by others and updating the page information. Please READ the article before reverting back to an outdated version- you are making this problematic and may be reported and removed for such behavior.

Feel free. I just noticed that you were doing the same stuff on Jam Cruise. Drmies (talk) 17:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. Drmies (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't edited anything on Jam Cruise in months.
This is updated information on the event - I don't understand why you keep reverting back and trying to keep old info on this page. What is promotional about the version I just added and you replaced yet again? I am adding the history and lineup, and dates, and new info now that the next year has been announced - the main section needs to be updated. If you can point out "promotional sentences" then let me know and we can work on this together. But simply removing everything I am adding and attempting to update is completely disruptive and weird. Help me out here with editing, not just replacing the whole article to an outdated version that is missing historical information.
Your language is not neutral. Your updates are basically directory-style information of who all played there, which is not of encyclopedic value just because you say so. "Historical" information must be relevant, neutral--and well-verified. As for Jam Cruise, it doesn't matter when you edited it; what matters is that it suffered from the same lack of neutrality, and given that they're run by the same company, a company on which you have a highly promotional draft in your user space, I cannot help but think that your interest is in promoting that outfit. Drmies (talk) 17:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My deepest apologies for not having the utmost experience in encyclopedic writing. What sounds promotional to you sounds descriptive to me - I am learning and working on establishing this tone of writing. My draft space has nothing to do with either of these posts - it is a work in progress to have our own information page. I am not attempting to be promotional in any way shape or form, just working on editing this down and re-writing on it (hence why it is simply sitting in my draft space). Thank you for your sincere deep interest in me and these minor two articles. The reason this information is historical is because it is the history of the event and is well established in major news sources, such as Rolling Stone, MTV, Billboard magazine, ect. It is literally, the history of the event, which can be found all over the internet and in the news. In the past I sourced this information, but alas, it has disappeared. One day hopefully I can be like you, such a proactive member of the highly intelligent wiki community. Until then, let me struggle with my attempt to sound like an encyclopedia. Surely you started as such a lowly position and bad writing style, formatted from years of creative writing classes in school. Again, how about you be a good member of wiki by helping EDIT, not remove and replace with an old version.
Sorry, I never took creative writing. Editing sometimes means cutting. If you want to know what encyclopedic writing looks like, read some of the best articles we have--the Featured articles. They are categorized so you can look for the business section. I won't repeat what I already said--what you may call "history" was, in that article, just a list of names. That's not the history of the company or the product, it's just namedropping.
Two more things: your cynical tone possibly works much better in real life than on the internet--here, it's neither charming nor sharp, it's just insulting. Also, your use of the phrase "our own information page" is telling--not just because you said "our" (duh), but also because you said "information page". Wikipedia is not for your or anyone else's "information page"--that's what the company websites is for. Drmies (talk) 00:14, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]