User talk:Alimovvarsu

@Mccapra: More sources were added, can I remove the notability tag Andrey Bokarev?Alimovvarsu (talk) 19:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Elbatli per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Elbatli. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs: I created articles about notable entrepreneur! sufficient sources show that? why I was blocked?Alimovvarsu (talk) 11:21, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alimovvarsu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

May I know why this happened? Is it happened because the articles I made have were tagged for notability? Alimovvarsu (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The reason for your block is given above. Yamla (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Star Mississippi: Do you know how long I have to wait? I told everything that occurred. Alimovvarsu (talk) 18:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alimovvarsu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How can I prove that something went wrong? As far as I understand, this happened because of commenting in two AFD. I read the page of scckpoppet in Russian wikipedia, but I did not understand what it has to do with me. Because I have told ″sources provided″ they think I am another user who has said ″sources provided″. Sometimes I I get help from Google translate as I am not a native English. Alimovvarsu (talk) 12:38, 12 November 2022 (UTC) *Or I used "does not meet any criteria for notabilit″ or "does not satisfy any criteria for notability" because this ia a common sentences in AFDs I saw them and used, due to my commen appear more professionally!Alimovvarsu (talk) 13:14, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per lack of competence demonstrated below. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: could you reply me? Alimovvarsu (talk) 15:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that if you need to use a translation program to communicate, that you stay on the Russian Wikipedia until your English skills improve. Translators do not always work well. 331dot (talk) 15:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Honestly, immigration is one of my reasons to contribute on Wikipedia to improve my writing skill by creating articles and commenting in discussions. Generally using auto translators is forbidden? I mean using as getting help not coppy-paste. Before strating, I read Wikipedia:Terms of use and I think I did not I did not break the rules. Please let me know what is my duty? Alimovvarsu (talk) 15:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't necessarily forbidden, but translators are not perfect. If you can't communicate with us without using a translator, your skills are probably not sufficient to participate here. Just a suggestion. 331dot (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:Actually for some of verbs and specially collocations I need to get help from Google translate. But created articles was written 80% by me and 10% by GT and 105 by checking other articles. Another article was ready to publish before being blocked. Please let me know how long it will take to be fixed? When I can start creating and editing?Alimovvarsu (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]