User talk:AlfredHitchcockFromMeTV

Dale McRaven moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dale McRaven, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 17:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Good Morning World (American TV series). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Stop creating articles about living people in mainspace that are unsourced or poorly sourced. CUPIDICAE💕 18:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Further, adding the private Facebook accounts of individuals to articles or anywhere else for that matter is a blockable offense. Stop doing it. CUPIDICAE💕 18:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Bonaduce moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joseph Bonaduce, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 18:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlfredHitchcockFromMeTV. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AlfredHitchcockFromMeTV (talk) 18:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jerome Guardino

The article Jerome Guardino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlfredHitchcockFromMeTV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to apologize for all the things I done. First, with the new wiki pages (I was trying to just all these people's Wikipedia pages shown out with just putting the info).

Second, with the sockpuppets are that first with OfficialMaybeTV, I was just trying to put more info in lotsa luck episode and I did not knew a lot of things of wikipedia with OfficialMaybeTV and this account was used a little.

With JuddTheDearJohn, I've only made that Wynn Irwin wiki page and was my first wikipage and I headed to Judd since I felt like OfficialMaybeTV was getting a little hate. Then, I tried to make a Jack knight wiki but like I was putting wrong info or stuff, then when I was about to take a break of wiki and checked Jack knight wiki and I did do it very wrong.

Then, I've learned more things of wiki and made Jerome Guardino in amonyman and why I made Some Random Wiki Stranger and first I thought it wasn't my account but I remembered that I made and pressed make account but accident and wanted to change my username.

Then, I have made anonymous man and in the day I made David Sabin, I was finished with it and I felt like doing more and I felt like I couldn't have stopped myself but that's the appealing I guess but if this gets unblock, then I would like to have Anonymous Man as my account.

Decline reason:

This doesn't convince me that you've even read, let alone understand and will comply with, our policy around sockpuppets (WP:SOCK). Yamla (talk) 20:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yeah, forgot to add the spaces but wanted to see if it could like I felt that if I added the spaces then wouldn't even finish what I was saying. AlfredHitchcockFromMeTV (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dale McRaven

Hello, AlfredHitchcockFromMeTV. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dale McRaven, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dale McRaven

Hello, AlfredHitchcockFromMeTV. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dale McRaven".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Bonaduce

Hello, AlfredHitchcockFromMeTV. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Bonaduce, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph Bonaduce

Hello, AlfredHitchcockFromMeTV. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Bonaduce".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]