User talk:Alexanderbelice

Replaceable fair use File:Ron St. Angelo at Texas Stadium.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ron St. Angelo at Texas Stadium.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ron St. Angelo, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:11, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Morbidthoughts I make the changes repeatedly then someone else sees it as wrong and it's exhausting. It's not like this is Python. This dude is dying and people giving grief. So I ask you what exact line to you see as an error and what is the correct way to display it. Let's see if you're different from the others and actually help or just complain. Peace.

Please add inline footnotes to the sentences and paragraphs of the article so that we know where the information is coming from. To learn how to do this. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rotideypoc41352 Thank you for making the edits, this is not my thing, I'm a Cinematographer- can the advisory at the tope of Ron's article be removed or do I need to make additional changes?