User talk:AlexWilkes/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:AlexWilkes. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Proposed deletion of Years in motoring
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Years in motoring, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Seemingly pointless list that merely duplicates a category
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. sassf (talk) 21:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Alder Coppice Primary School
I have nominated Alder Coppice Primary School, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alder Coppice Primary School (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Malleus Fatuorum 15:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Christopher Walker (conductor)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Christopher Walker (conductor), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Orphan and unreferenced, with little notability indicated.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 14:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Timothy Morss and Brett Tyler
I have nominated Timothy Morss and Brett Tyler, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Morss and Brett Tyler. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. BJTalk 20:18, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of John O'Shaugnessey
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is John O'Shaugnessey. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John O'Shaugnessey. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Winchester Crown Court
The article Winchester Crown Court has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- fails WP:GNG
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 19:20, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Get Johnny Week
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Get Johnny Week. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Johnny Week (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello AlexWilkes! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 34 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Micky Quinn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Mervyn Day - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Trevor Oakes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Joe Mycock - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Philip Mackenzie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Jean-Marc Perret - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- David Thwaites - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- John Bowler (chairman) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Saved!
Winchester Crown Court was merged in to Winchester and John Bowler (chairman) was merged in to his soccer club.--Snow storm in Eastern Asia (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Joe Mycock has joined the team article along with a bit on Will Carling.
Welcome!
Welcome Hello AlexWilkes/Archive 3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hu 22:05, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, AlexWilkes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Snow storm in Eastern Asia (talk) 17:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Scott McLean (BNP)
I have nominated Scott McLean (BNP), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott McLean (BNP). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kittybrewster ☎ 14:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
The article Maureen Morris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable actress, appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:ENT.
WP:GNG: no secondary news coverage via Google News, one passing reference in a reference of British serials at British Books. WP:ENT: lacks multiple notable "significant" roles. Closest to a signficant role is (according to IMDB and the article text) Mrs McReady in the Lion, Witch, Wardrobe serial, but that character isn't "significant" enough to rate a WP article by itself despite deep coverage of LWW. No visible cult following, interviews, etc.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. j⚛e deckertalk 03:45, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
The article Dudley Primary Care Trust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Local org. Article makes no claim of notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 09:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcomeing in
Welcome!
Hello, AlexWilkes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Snow storm in Eastern Asia (talk) 10:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Centro trains and former routes
Have you got any information you could add to this topic?--Snow storm in Eastern Asia (talk) 16:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Have you got any information you could add to this topic? I think the page needs a bit of an expantion. --Snow storm in Eastern Asia (talk) 10:20, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Brettell Lane railway station
Fancy helping me to up grade it and add photos to it?--Wipsenade (talk) 17:15, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
--Wipsenade (talk) 17:37, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
The Raghvir Singh assult
Ive saved (see Dudley Port)! The Raghvir Singh assult.Wipsenade (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Alexander Blair for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Blair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Blair until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Puffin Let's talk! 10:16, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dudley Evening Mail
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dudley Evening Mail requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Angela Barlow for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angela Barlow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Barlow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 15:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Yep90.244.85.152 (talk) 22:57, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Greets Green for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greets Green is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greets Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James (T • C) • 12:39 PM • 01:39, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Geoffrey Russell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geoffrey Russell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey Russell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 22:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Irene Marot for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irene Marot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene Marot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 22:25, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Sophie Cook for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophie Cook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Cook until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --woodensuperman 13:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of 1985 in motoring for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1985 in motoring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1985 in motoring until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 21:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Life And Other Times listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Life And Other Times. Since you had some involvement with the Life And Other Times redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
The article Squirrels Estate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
a housing development, does not meet WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 00:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
The article Tanhouse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
non-notable housing development, does not meet WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 00:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)