User talk:AlexNewArtBot/PlantsSearchResult

Please exclude "power plant" and "LNG plant".Beagel 18:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

feedback

In response to the feedback banner placed on the page, I use this bot-generated list daily. Seems a-ok to me. What kind of feedback are you looking for? --Rkitko ^(talk) 03:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few ones misplaced. Any way we could exclude these kinds? Foshalee Plantation (several plantation-articles have shown up), and I'm not sure which keyword is triggering these contributions by Kevmin to show up (e.g. Lanceolitidae). And once in a while we get a fungi-related article showing up here, but that's probably a result of the article stating it's a plant pathogen, which is useful to the project. Otherwise the list is very nice and I appreciate the work that went into creating it and maintaining the bot. --Rkitko ^(talk) 01:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

recent false positives:

Maybe looking at how these were listed might help reduce the number of them:

Secret (brand)
Wheatlands (Sevierville, Tennessee), Rose Glen (Sevierville, Tennessee) (excluding anything that contains the NRHP infobox would be a pretty safe and efficient bet to me)
Karagöl-Sahara (protected areas are rarely within the purview of the project)
Defence Science and Technology Organization (the algorithm detected the word "plant" inside a category! Unfortunately very few relevant categories actually contain that word...)