User talk:AlexJohnn55

July 2023

Hello, I'm Boyinaroom. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Mark V. Shaney have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Boyinaroom (talk) 09:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok noted with thanks AlexJohnn55 (talk) 09:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bard (chatbot). Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 10:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Tay (chatbot), you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. [1] MrOllie (talk) 11:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. CodeTalker (talk) 13:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlexJohnn55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm providing a informational source on wikipedia platform in a very mannered way AlexJohnn55 (talk) 09:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Every spammer thinks that their spam is "informational". On Wikipedia there is no distinction between "informational" and "promotional", as Wikipedia is not for merely providing information. You'll have to describe your connection to the website you were spamming and tell us what edits you will make instead now that you know that won't be permitted. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.